Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Software - Infrastructure
Semiconductors
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $418M | $5.14T | $665.93B | $3.81B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.58B | $215.94B | $37.45B | $3.33B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $86M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 4.0% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 35.2% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 60.4% | 11.7% | 11.3% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 25.6x | 59.7x | 8.4x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $235M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $4.62B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $964M | $14.27B |
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lesaka Technologies… (LSAK) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2226.3 | +2126.3% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 776.4 | +676.4% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 183.2 | +83.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.20 vs AMD's 2.30
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 110.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 11.55
Among these 5 stocks, AMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FOUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 0.7%
- Beta 1.51, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.66x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 105.1x)
- 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +439.7% vs FOUR's -43.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs AMD's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs FOUR's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.0% |
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
FOUR leads 1 • LSAK leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 64.8x FOUR's $3.3B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, LSAK holds the edge at +17.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $215.9B | $37.5B | $3.3B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $133.2B | $6.6B | $629M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $120.1B | $5.0B | $86M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | $96.7B | $8.6B | $687M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +35.2% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +60.4% | +11.7% | +11.3% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +55.6% | +13.3% | +2.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +44.8% | +22.9% | +20.6% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.5% | +73.2% | +37.8% | -100.0% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +140.7% | +97.8% | +90.9% | -105.0% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FOUR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 72% valuation discount to AMD's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs AMD's 29.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $418M | $5.14T | $665.9B | $3.8B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $577M | $5.14T | $664.9B | $7.5B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.36x | 43.16x | 154.14x | 43.39x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.32x | 25.55x | 59.65x | 8.41x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 29.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 87.11x | 38.59x | 99.26x | 9.53x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 23.80x | 19.22x | 0.91x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 32.85x | 10.61x | 2.13x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x | 98.88x | 7.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs LSAK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | +76.3% | +8.1% | +4.4% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +58.1% | +6.5% | +1.0% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | +81.8% | +4.7% | +6.3% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +97.2% | +5.7% | +6.3% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 2.36x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $159M | $807M | -$1.1B | $3.7B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $964M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $235M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.28x | 545.03x | 33.19x | 3.40x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,364 for FOUR. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs FOUR's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +12.0% | +82.8% | -25.2% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | +80.7% | +307.0% | -43.7% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | +625.9% | +329.8% | -24.0% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.3% | +1328.9% | +418.3% | -46.4% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +23902.3% | +11090.7% | +39.7% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +93.6% | +62.6% | -8.7% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LSAK and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LSAK is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 1.73x | 2.30x | 1.51x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.54 | $216.80 | $430.57 | $108.50 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.39 | $112.28 | $96.88 | $39.91 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +97.6% | +94.9% | +43.2% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 60.7 | 81.2 | 43.3 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 164.5M | 36.4M | 2.2M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NVDA and FOUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LSAK as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 56.6% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). FOUR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $278.83 | $310.86 | $73.36 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 79 | 70 | 29 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $0.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +12.8% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LSAK vs NVDA vs AMD vs FOUR vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lesaka Technologies, Inc. (LSAK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 43.
2x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -46.
4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus LSAK's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lesaka Technologies, Inc.
(LSAK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning AMD is approximately 1030% more volatile than LSAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -322. 2% for Lesaka Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -13. 3% for Lesaka Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -4. 1% for LSAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 96. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 56. 6% to $73. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC?
In this comparison, FOUR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. LSAK, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LSAK or NVDA or AMD or FOUR or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lesaka Technologies, Inc.
(LSAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20)). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSAK: -56. 3%, AMD: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSAK and NVDA and AMD and FOUR and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LSAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FOUR pays a dividend while LSAK, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.