Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LSBK logo
LSBK
BWFG logo
BWFG
NBTB logo
NBTB
CZWI logo
CZWI
TRST logo
TRST
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.+92.3%
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$448M
5Y Perf.+253.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+51.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$205M
5Y Perf.+211.1%
TRST
TrustCo Bank Corp NY

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$925M
5Y Perf.+65.1%

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LSBK logoLSBK
BWFG logoBWFG
NBTB logoNBTB
CZWI logoCZWI
TRST logoTRST
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$137M$448M$2.44B$205M$925M
Revenue (TTM)$40M$208M$902M$90M$278M
Net Income (TTM)$7M$35M$169M$14M$61M
Gross Margin70.9%51.6%73.6%54.7%67.1%
Operating Margin22.1%23.3%24.3%7.0%29.2%
Forward P/E18.1x10.4x11.2x11.7x18.2x
Total Debt$1M$180M$327M$52M$193M
Cash & Equiv.$64M$225M$185M$119M$51M

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LSBK
BWFG
NBTB
CZWI
TRST
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Lake Shore Bancorp,… (LSBK)100192.3+92.3%
Bankwell Financial … (BWFG)100353.3+253.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100151.8+51.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100311.1+211.1%
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST)100165.1+65.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BWFG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NBT Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. LSBK and TRST also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇BWFG emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

LSBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 200.88x
  • NIM 3.4% vs TRST's 2.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
  • 202.4% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 121.2%
  • PEG 0.24 vs TRST's 5.02
  • Lower P/E (10.4x vs 18.2x), PEG 0.24 vs 5.02
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • 3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%
Best for: income & stability
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: defensive
TRST
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
The Banking Pick

TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +74.9% vs NBTB's +20.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueBWFG logoBWFGLower P/E (10.4x vs 18.2x), PEG 0.24 vs 5.02
Quality / MarginsBWFG logoBWFGEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs LSBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyLSBK logoLSBKBeta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%
Momentum (1Y)TRST logoTRST+74.9% vs NBTB's +20.5%
Efficiency (ROA)BWFG logoBWFGEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs LSBK's 0.5%

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LSBKLake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2019
Service Charges and Fees
100.0%$1M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY
FY 2025
Wealth Management Fees Member
77.1%$8M
Other Member
22.9%$2M

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLSBKLAGGINGTRST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 22.8x LSBK's $40M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$208M$902M$90M$278M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$53M$241M$9M$90M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$35M$169M$14M$61M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M-$5M$225M$11M$46M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.9%+51.6%+73.6%+54.7%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.1%+23.3%+24.3%+7.0%+29.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+16.9%+18.8%+16.0%+22.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.8%-2.4%+24.9%+12.4%+16.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.8%+2.1%+39.5%+63.0%+44.1%
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.6x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 30% valuation discount to LSBK's 18.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.30x vs TRST's 4.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
Market CapShares × price$137M$448M$2.4B$205M$925M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$74M$403M$2.6B$138M$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.13x12.62x14.02x14.62x16.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.37x11.18x11.73x18.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.59x0.30x1.99x2.88x4.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.02x7.66x10.70x15.56x11.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.46x2.16x2.81x2.28x3.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x1.46x1.25x1.10x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.40x17.15x11.13x19.79x20.23x
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — LSBK and BWFG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for LSBK. LSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSBK scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+12.2%+9.5%+7.8%+8.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+1.1%+1.1%+0.8%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+8.0%+7.9%+2.0%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+4.4%+2.4%+0.6%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986767
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.60x0.17x0.28x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$63M-$45M$142M-$67M$142M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$64M$225M$185M$119M$51M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$180M$327M$52M$193M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.75x0.49x1.05x0.16x0.90x
Evenly matched — LSBK and BWFG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BWFG and CZWI and TRST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $22,029 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,690 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +74.9% total return vs NBTB's +20.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.7% vs NBTB's 14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.7%+25.6%+14.0%+23.6%+28.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+53.1%+63.9%+20.5%+62.6%+74.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.3%+137.4%+49.9%+149.8%+87.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+67.1%+120.3%+46.9%+64.1%+73.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.6%+202.4%+103.1%+121.2%+108.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+33.4%+14.5%+35.7%+23.4%
Evenly matched — BWFG and CZWI and TRST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSBK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TRST's 94.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.27x0.62x0.73x0.42x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.40$56.70$48.81$22.62$55.60
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.63$34.53$39.20$12.83$30.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+100.0%+99.1%+95.6%+94.3%+94.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.158.651.056.850.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K48K277K48K101K
LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BWFG as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs LSBK's 0.79%.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts31023
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+1.4%+3.1%+1.7%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001361
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14$0.80$1.43$0.37$1.51
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.3%+0.4%+3.0%+4.1%
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BWFG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LSBK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.

Best OverallLake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LSBK vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

(BWFG) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

(BWFG) delivered a total return of +120. 3%, compared to +46. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +202. 4% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

(LSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately 169% more volatile than LSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK).

09

Is LSBK or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

(LSBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +111. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSBK: +111. 6%, NBTB: +103. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LSBK and BWFG and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.