Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $137M | $2.44B | $205M | $925M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $902M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 73.6% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 24.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | 11.2x | 11.7x | 18.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Shore Bancorp,… (LSBK) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 311.1 | +211.1% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 165.1 | +65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSBK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 200.88x
- NIM 3.4% vs TRST's 2.6%
- Beta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.59 vs TRST's 5.02
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 121.2% 10Y total return vs LSBK's 111.6%
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +74.9% vs NBTB's +20.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 18.2x), PEG 1.59 vs 5.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.9% vs NBTB's +20.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5% |
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
LSBK leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 22.8x LSBK's $40M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $902M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +73.6% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +24.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +18.8% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +24.9% | +12.4% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LSBK and NBTB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 23% valuation discount to LSBK's 18.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LSBK offers better value at 1.59x vs TRST's 4.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $2.4B | $205M | $925M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $74M | $2.6B | $138M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.13x | 14.02x | 14.62x | 16.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.18x | 11.73x | 18.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.59x | 1.99x | 2.88x | 4.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.02x | 10.70x | 15.56x | 11.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.46x | 2.81x | 2.28x | 3.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 1.25x | 1.10x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.40x | 11.13x | 19.79x | 20.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for LSBK. LSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRST's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSBK scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$63M | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and TRST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $17,356 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,690 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +74.9% total return vs NBTB's +20.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.7% vs NBTB's 14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.7% | +14.0% | +23.6% | +28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.1% | +20.5% | +62.6% | +74.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.3% | +49.9% | +149.8% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.1% | +46.9% | +64.1% | +73.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.6% | +103.1% | +121.2% | +108.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +14.5% | +35.7% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSBK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TRST's 94.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.73x | 0.42x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.40 | $48.81 | $22.62 | $55.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.63 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +95.6% | +94.3% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.1 | 51.0 | 56.8 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 277K | 48K | 101K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs LSBK's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +3.1% | +1.7% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +4.1% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). LSBK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +73.
6%, compared to +46. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +121. 2% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately 169% more volatile than LSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 47. 7% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK).
09Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +111. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSBK: +111. 6%, NBTB: +103. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSBK and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.