LTH vs XPOF

For growth investors, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (23. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) delivered a total return of +89. 2%, compared to -45. 9% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LTH returned +89. 2% versus XPOF's -45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Xponential Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XPOF is approximately 83% more volatile than LTH relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -1. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 124. 3% year-over-year, compared to 35. 2% for Xponential Fitness, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LTH leads at 18. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -10. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPOF leads at 25. 3% versus 16. 1% for LTH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPOF leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LTH: 24. 1% to $41. 67.

In this comparison, XPOF (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. LTH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.

(LTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06)). Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LTH: +89. 2%, XPOF: -45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

XPOF pays a dividend while LTH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.