Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRX vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
LTRX vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $231M | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -5.4% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 34.8x | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.61B |
LTRX vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2381.7 | +2281.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRX vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +173.7% vs NVDA's +80.7%
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs LTRX's 425.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs LTRX's -23.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.6x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs LTRX's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs LTRX's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +173.7% vs NVDA's +80.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs LTRX's -5.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs -10.5% |
LTRX vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTRX vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 1821.0x LTRX's $119M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LTRX's -5.5%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.9% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LTRX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $231M | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.10x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.81x | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.88x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.03x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.13x | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-9 for LTRX. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LTRX's 0.28x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.8% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.12x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,877 for LTRX. Over the past 12 months, LTRX leads with a +173.7% total return vs NVDA's +80.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs LTRX's 16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.7% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +425.2% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTRX's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs LTRX's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.03 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 613K | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LTRX as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for LTRX (target: $9) vs 31.8% for NVDA (target: $279).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.83 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LTRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LTRX vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRX or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTRX or NVDA?
On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTRX or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to +8.
8% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus LTRX's +425. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTRX or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Lantronix, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning LTRX is approximately 26% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 28% for Lantronix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTRX or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -141. 7% for Lantronix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTRX or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -9. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -8. 9% for LTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTRX or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
6x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Lantronix, Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LTRX: 51. 5% to $8. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTRX or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LTRX or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+239.
0% 10Y return). Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +239. 0%, LTRX: +425. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTRX and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.