Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LUCD
Lucid Diagnostics Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$135M
5Y Perf.-89.7%
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.-92.4%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$2.04B
5Y Perf.-82.6%
MDT
Medtronic plc

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$97.62B
5Y Perf.-36.5%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$80.15B
5Y Perf.+25.0%

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LUCD logoLUCD
NNOX logoNNOX
NVCR logoNVCR
MDT logoMDT
BSX logoBSX
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$135M$113M$2.04B$97.62B$80.15B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$12M$674M$35.48B$20.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-10.44B$-56M$-173M$4.61B$2.89B
Gross Margin-40.2%-98.8%75.2%61.9%69.0%
Operating Margin-9.7%-469.7%-27.2%17.9%19.8%
Forward P/E13.8x16.0x
Total Debt$21M$7M$290M$28.52B$12.42B
Cash & Equiv.$22M$39M$103M$2.22B$2.04B

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LUCD
NNOX
NVCR
MDT
BSX
StockOct 21May 26Return
Lucid Diagnostics I… (LUCD)10010.3-89.7%
Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX)1007.6-92.4%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10017.4-82.6%
Medtronic plc (MDT)10063.5-36.5%
Boston Scientific C… (BSX)100125.0+25.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Boston Scientific Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. LUCD and NVCR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LUCD
Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
The Growth Play

LUCD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 79.0%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.6%
  • 79.0% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
Best for: growth exposure
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NNOX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Momentum Pick

NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +2.6% vs NNOX's -66.6%
Best for: momentum
MDT
Medtronic plc
The Income Pick

MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.7%
  • Lower P/E (13.8x vs 16.0x)
  • 3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 175.8% ROA vs LUCD's -196.2%
Best for: income & stability
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BSX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 143.6% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 38.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.62x
  • Beta 0.30, current ratio 1.62x
  • 14.4% margin vs LUCD's -8.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLUCD logoLUCD79.0% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
ValueMDT logoMDTLower P/E (13.8x vs 16.0x)
Quality / MarginsBSX logoBSX14.4% margin vs LUCD's -8.6%
Stability / SafetyBSX logoBSXBeta 0.30 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
DividendsMDT logoMDT3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NVCR logoNVCR+2.6% vs NNOX's -66.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MDT logoMDT175.8% ROA vs LUCD's -196.2%

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LUCDLucid Diagnostics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NNOXNano-X Imaging Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MDTMedtronic plc
FY 2025
Cardiac and Vascular Group
37.3%$12.5B
Neuroscience Group
29.4%$9.8B
Medical Surgical
25.1%$8.4B
Diabetes Group
8.2%$2.8B
BSXBoston Scientific Corporation
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
66.0%$13.3B
MedSurg
34.0%$6.8B

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBSXLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 8347.9x LUCD's $4M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUCD's -8.6%. On growth, LUCD holds the edge at +1032.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$12M$674M$35.5B$20.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11.4B-$46M-$165M$9.4B$4.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10.4B-$56M-$173M$4.6B$2.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$44M-$47M-$48M$5.4B$3.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-40.2%-98.8%+75.2%+61.9%+69.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.7%-4.7%-27.2%+17.9%+19.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.6%-4.5%-25.7%+13.0%+14.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%-3.8%-7.1%+15.2%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1032.3%+13.7%+12.3%+8.8%+15.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.0%+8.7%-100.0%-11.9%+18.5%
BSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.1x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 24% valuation discount to BSX's 27.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDT's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSX's 24.2x.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Market CapShares × price$135M$113M$2.0B$97.6B$80.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$134M$81M$2.2B$123.9B$90.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.98x-1.90x-14.66x21.09x27.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.80x15.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate35.17x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.06x24.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue31.03x10.03x3.11x2.91x3.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.65x0.54x5.86x2.04x3.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.83x21.91x
MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BSX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-404 for LUCD. NNOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUCD's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs NNOX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-404.1%-35.5%-50.8%+9.4%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-196.2%-31.6%-16.5%+175.8%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.9%-16.4%+6.0%+8.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-18.1%-28.4%-28.9%+7.5%+11.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.94x0.04x0.85x0.59x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$32M$187M$26.3B$10.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$22M$39M$103M$2.2B$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$21M$7M$290M$28.5B$12.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5162.15x-379.29x-96.80x9.08x11.03x
BSX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $12,469 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $661 for NNOX. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +2.6% total return vs NNOX's -66.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 0.5% vs NNOX's -52.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.0%-38.9%+36.4%-20.0%-43.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-13.4%-66.6%+2.6%-5.5%-47.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.2%-89.4%-74.2%-6.3%+1.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.2%-93.4%-90.2%-29.2%+24.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.2%-96.1%+38.5%+24.3%+143.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.5%-52.7%-36.4%-2.1%+0.5%
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs NNOX's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x1.75x2.15x0.42x0.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.70$5.86$20.06$106.33$109.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.95$1.66$9.82$75.91$53.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.6%+29.5%+89.2%+71.6%+49.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.937.670.929.235.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded715K1.4M1.4M7.9M15.6M
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LUCD as "Buy", NNOX as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy", BSX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 940.5% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs 43.8% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLUCD logoLUCDLucid Diagnostics…NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plcBSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50$18.00$33.50$109.50$91.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts55154943
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises360
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.3%0.0%
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BSX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBoston Scientific Corporati… (BSX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LUCD vs NNOX vs NVCR vs MDT vs BSX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.

(LUCD) is the stronger pick with 79. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.

1x versus Boston Scientific Corporation at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +24.

7%, compared to -93. 4% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSX returned +143. 6% versus NNOX's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

30β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 616% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Diagnostics Inc.

(LUCD) is pulling ahead at 79. 0% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boston Scientific Corporation grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to 15. 7% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUCD leads at 105. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

4% net margin versus -1047. 6% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -1059. 6% for LUCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 13.

8x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Boston Scientific Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNOX: 940. 5% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX?

In this comparison, MDT (3.

7% yield) pays a dividend. LUCD, NNOX, NVCR, BSX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LUCD or NNOX or NVCR or MDT or BSX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

42), 3. 7% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LUCD and NNOX and NVCR and MDT and BSX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LUCD is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MDT pays a dividend while LUCD, NNOX, NVCR, BSX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LUCD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51613%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NNOX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BSX

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LUCD and NNOX and NVCR and MDT and BSX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LUCD: 103227.6% · NNOX: 13.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.