Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $54M | $1.31B | $1.92B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $915M | $674M | $552M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $131M | $-173M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 85.8% | 75.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | 5.6% | -27.2% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.5x | — | 370.7x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $32M | $290M | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $105M | $103M | $167M |
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 80.4 | -19.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 6.08x
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 370.7x)
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs INSP's -70.9%
ATRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- 95.1% 10Y total return vs INSP's 82.4%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0%
- Beta 1.03 vs LUNG's 2.36, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 370.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs LUNG's -59.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs LUNG's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs INSP's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs LUNG's -38.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -72.0% |
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATRC leads 1 • LUNG leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $915M annually — 10.1x LUNG's $90M. INSP is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUNG's -59.7%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $915M | $674M | $552M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | $62M | -$165M | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | $131M | -$173M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $97M | -$48M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.2% | +85.8% | +75.2% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.3% | +5.6% | -27.2% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.7% | +14.3% | -25.7% | -0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.3% | +10.6% | -7.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +1.6% | +12.3% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.2% | -5.0% | -100.0% | +101.6% |
Valuation Metrics
INSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INSP's 19.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $1.3B | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 9.32x | -13.80x | -115.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.46x | — | 370.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.11x | — | 77.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 1.44x | 2.92x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.74x | 5.51x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.73x | — | 29.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LUNG. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUNG's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSP scores 7/9 vs LUNG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -82.8% | +18.0% | -50.8% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.2% | +15.2% | -16.5% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.0% | +6.0% | -16.4% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.3% | +6.7% | -28.9% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 0.04x | 0.85x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$73M | $187M | -$79M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $105M | $103M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $32M | $290M | $88M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.55x | 418.58x | -96.80x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATRC five years ago would be worth $3,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $298 for LUNG. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs INSP's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATRC at -16.5% vs LUNG's -53.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.8% | -50.6% | +28.3% | -29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.5% | -70.9% | +1.1% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.8% | -83.9% | -75.7% | -41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -76.6% | -91.3% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +82.4% | +30.3% | +95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.3% | -45.6% | -37.6% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and ATRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUNG's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs INSP's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.27x | 2.20x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.88 | $163.35 | $20.06 | $43.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.13 | $44.41 | $9.82 | $26.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +27.9% | +83.9% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 31.6 | 69.8 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 567K | 1.1M | 1.5M | 669K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSP as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 100.4% upside for INSP (target: $91) vs 82.3% for ATRC (target: $51).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $91.33 | $33.50 | $50.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 15 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +13.3% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
INSP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ATRC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LUNG vs INSP vs NVCR vs ATRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
On forward P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
Over the past 5 years, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) delivered a total return of -64. 2%, compared to -97. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATRC returned +95. 1% versus LUNG's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Pulmonx Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning LUNG is approximately 130% more volatile than ATRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 104% for Pulmonx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Pulmonx Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSP leads at 30. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 9% net margin versus -59. 7% for Pulmonx Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSP leads at 5. 6% versus -59. 3% for LUNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 346. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSP: 100. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LUNG or INSP or NVCR or ATRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATRC: +95. 1%, LUNG: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LUNG and INSP and NVCR and ATRC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LUNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.