LVRO vs DE

For growth investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger pick with -2.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -87. 9% for Lavoro Limited (LVRO). Deere & Company (DE) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (33. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deere & Company (DE) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Deere & Company (DE) delivered a total return of +58.

7%, compared to -98. 6% for Lavoro Limited (LVRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +676. 6% versus LVRO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

56β versus Lavoro Limited's 1. 08β — meaning LVRO is approximately 91% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deere & Company (DE) is pulling ahead at -2.

2% versus -87. 9% for Lavoro Limited (LVRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lavoro Limited grew EPS 38. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Deere & Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, DE leads at -3. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Deere & Company (DE) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

3% net margin versus -40. 9% for Lavoro Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus -23. 4% for LVRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LVRO: 3335.

1% to $4. 50.

In this comparison, DE (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. LVRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

56), 1. 1% yield, +676. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +676. 6%, LVRO: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LVRO (Basic Materials) and DE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

DE pays a dividend while LVRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.