Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LXEH vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LXEH vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-151M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 1.9% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -160.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $132M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $221M | $10.73B |
LXEH vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixiang Education H… (LXEH) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 281.5 | +181.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXEH vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXEH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.92, Low D/E 90.4%, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta -0.92, current ratio 2.10x
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs LXEH's -99.8%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs LXEH's -179.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (67.2% vs 90.4%) | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs LXEH's -96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs LXEH's -31.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -60.7% |
LXEH vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LXEH vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 8332.0x LXEH's $84M. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LXEH's -179.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$151M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -160.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -72.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.0% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LXEH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LXEH. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXEH's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs LXEH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.5% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$89M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $221M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.28x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for LXEH. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs LXEH's -96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs LXEH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.1% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LXEH and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LXEH is the less volatile stock with a -0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LXEH's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.92x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.00 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LXEH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LXEH vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXEH or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 7x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LXEH or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LXEH or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately -113% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 90% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LXEH or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 84. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LXEH or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LXEH or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. LXEH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LXEH or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, WMT: +499. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LXEH and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while LXEH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.