Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LXU vs NTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LXU
LSB Industries, Inc.

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$975M
5Y Perf.+1533.4%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.

Agricultural Inputs

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$32.89B
5Y Perf.+101.1%

LXU vs NTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LXU logoLXU
NTR logoNTR
IndustryChemicalsAgricultural Inputs
Market Cap$975M$32.89B
Revenue (TTM)$641M$26.90B
Net Income (TTM)$46M$2.27B
Gross Margin19.6%31.1%
Operating Margin12.5%13.4%
Forward P/E12.6x12.0x
Total Debt$489M$12.93B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$700M

LXU vs NTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LXU
NTR
StockMay 20May 26Return
LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU)1001633.4+1533.4%
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)100201.1+101.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LXU vs NTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. LSB Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LXU
LSB Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

LXU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 225.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.0%
  • 75.0% 10Y total return vs NTR's 54.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 94.1%, current ratio 2.78x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
The Income Pick

NTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.07, yield 3.2%
  • Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.6x)
  • 8.4% margin vs LXU's 7.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLXU logoLXU17.8% revenue growth vs NTR's 5.3%
ValueNTR logoNTRLower P/E (12.0x vs 12.6x)
Quality / MarginsNTR logoNTR8.4% margin vs LXU's 7.2%
Stability / SafetyNTR logoNTRLower D/E ratio (51.1% vs 94.1%)
DividendsNTR logoNTR3.2% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LXU logoLXU+104.7% vs NTR's +24.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NTR logoNTR4.3% ROA vs LXU's 4.0%, ROIC 8.0% vs 4.7%

LXU vs NTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LXULSB Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Chemical
100.0%$615M
NTRNutrien Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

LXU vs NTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNTRLAGGINGLXU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LXU and NTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 41.9x LXU's $641M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.4% (NTR) to 7.2% (LXU). On growth, LXU holds the edge at +18.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$641M$26.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$163M$6.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$46M$2.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$161M$2.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.6%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.5%+13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.2%+8.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.2%+7.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+6.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.8%+4.2%
Evenly matched — LXU and NTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.4x trailing earnings, NTR trades at a 64% valuation discount to LXU's 39.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTR's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LXU's 10.0x.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$975M$32.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$45.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS39.91x14.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.59x12.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.98x7.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.58x1.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.89x1.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF53.98x16.15x
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

NTR delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $9 for LXU. NTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXU's 0.94x.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.9%+9.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.0%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+8.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.9%+9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–988
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.94x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$470M$12.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$700M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$489M$12.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.66x5.44x
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LXU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LXU five years ago would be worth $28,967 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,815 for NTR. Over the past 12 months, LXU leads with a +104.7% total return vs NTR's +24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LXU at 12.3% vs NTR's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+58.3%+9.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+104.7%+24.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+41.6%+16.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+189.7%+28.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.0%+54.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.3%+5.1%
LXU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LXU's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.43x-0.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.21$85.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.46$53.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.8%+80.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.948.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M3.8M
NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates LXU as "Buy" and NTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for NTR (target: $84) vs -23.5% for LXU (target: $10). NTR is the only dividend payer here at 3.25% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLXU logoLXULSB Industries, I…NTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.38$84.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts1133
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises08
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.22
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+1.7%
NTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NTR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LXU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallNutrien Ltd. (NTR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LXU vs NTR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LXU or NTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LSB Industries, Inc.

(LXU) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LXU or NTR?

On trailing P/E, Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus LSB Industries, Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Nutrien Ltd. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LXU or NTR?

Over the past 5 years, LSB Industries, Inc.

(LXU) delivered a total return of +189. 7%, compared to +28. 1% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LXU returned +75. 0% versus NTR's +54. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LXU or NTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus LSB Industries, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning LXU is approximately -698% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 94% for LSB Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LXU or NTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSB Industries, Inc.

(LXU) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 5. 3% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutrien Ltd. grew EPS 248. 5% year-over-year, compared to 225. 9% for LSB Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTR leads at -10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LXU or NTR?

Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 4. 0% for LSB Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTR leads at 14. 5% versus 10. 2% for LXU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTR leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LXU or NTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for LSB Industries, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTR: 23. 2% to $84. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LXU or NTR?

In this comparison, NTR (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LXU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LXU or NTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +54. 0%, LXU: +75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LXU and NTR?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LXU is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NTR pays a dividend while LXU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LXU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LXU and NTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LXU: 18.2% · NTR: 6.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(LXU: 7.2% · NTR: 8.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LXU: 39.9x · NTR: 14.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.