Chemicals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LXU vs NTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
LXU vs NTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $975M | $32.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $641M | $26.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 19.6% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $489M | $12.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $700M |
LXU vs NTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) | 100 | 1633.4 | +1533.4% |
| Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) | 100 | 201.1 | +101.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXU vs NTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 225.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.0%
- 75.0% 10Y total return vs NTR's 54.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 94.1%, current ratio 2.78x
NTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.07, yield 3.2%
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.6x)
- 8.4% margin vs LXU's 7.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs NTR's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs LXU's 7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (51.1% vs 94.1%) | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.7% vs NTR's +24.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs LXU's 4.0%, ROIC 8.0% vs 4.7% |
LXU vs NTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LXU vs NTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LXU and NTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 41.9x LXU's $641M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.4% (NTR) to 7.2% (LXU). On growth, LXU holds the edge at +18.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $641M | $26.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $6.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, NTR trades at a 64% valuation discount to LXU's 39.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTR's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LXU's 10.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $32.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $45.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.91x | 14.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.59x | 12.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.98x | 7.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 53.98x | 16.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTR delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $9 for LXU. NTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXU's 0.94x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $470M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $700M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $489M | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.66x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LXU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LXU five years ago would be worth $28,967 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,815 for NTR. Over the past 12 months, LXU leads with a +104.7% total return vs NTR's +24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LXU at 12.3% vs NTR's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.3% | +9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.7% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.6% | +16.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.7% | +28.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +54.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.3% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LXU's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | -0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.21 | $85.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.46 | $53.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
NTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LXU as "Buy" and NTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for NTR (target: $84) vs -23.5% for LXU (target: $10). NTR is the only dividend payer here at 3.25% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.38 | $84.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.7% |
NTR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LXU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LXU vs NTR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXU or NTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSB Industries, Inc.
(LXU) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LXU or NTR?
On trailing P/E, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus LSB Industries, Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Nutrien Ltd. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LXU or NTR?
Over the past 5 years, LSB Industries, Inc.
(LXU) delivered a total return of +189. 7%, compared to +28. 1% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LXU returned +75. 0% versus NTR's +54. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LXU or NTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus LSB Industries, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning LXU is approximately -698% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 94% for LSB Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LXU or NTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSB Industries, Inc.
(LXU) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 5. 3% for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutrien Ltd. grew EPS 248. 5% year-over-year, compared to 225. 9% for LSB Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTR leads at -10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LXU or NTR?
Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 4. 0% for LSB Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTR leads at 14. 5% versus 10. 2% for LXU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTR leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LXU or NTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for LSB Industries, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTR: 23. 2% to $84. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LXU or NTR?
In this comparison, NTR (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LXU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LXU or NTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +54. 0%, LXU: +75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LXU and NTR?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LXU is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NTR pays a dividend while LXU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.