Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Business Equipment & Supplies
Semiconductors
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Business Equipment & Supplies | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $760M | $5.14T | $665.93B | $375M | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $592M | $215.94B | $37.45B | $1.55B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $74M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 30.7% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 60.4% | 11.7% | 7.9% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | 25.6x | 59.7x | 4.8x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $921M | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $64M | $14.27B |
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2381.7 | +2281.7% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 759.2 | +659.2% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 110.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 11.55
- 65.5% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
AMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 165.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 7.1%
- Beta 1.33, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.61x
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 105.1x)
- Beta 1.33 vs AMD's 2.30
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +439.7% vs ACCO's +22.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs AMD's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs ACCO's +22.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.0% |
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACCO leads 1 • LYTS leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 364.9x LYTS's $592M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $592M | $215.9B | $37.5B | $1.6B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $133.2B | $6.6B | $177M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $120.1B | $5.0B | $74M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $96.7B | $8.6B | $49M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +30.7% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +60.4% | +11.7% | +7.9% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +55.6% | +13.3% | +4.8% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +44.8% | +22.9% | +3.2% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +73.2% | +37.8% | +8.3% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +97.8% | +90.9% | +2.4% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 94% valuation discount to AMD's 154.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs AMD's 29.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $760M | $5.14T | $665.9B | $375M | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $823M | $5.14T | $664.9B | $1.2B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.91x | 43.16x | 154.14x | 9.23x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.34x | 25.55x | 59.65x | 4.83x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.82x | 0.45x | 29.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.03x | 38.59x | 99.26x | 6.80x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 23.80x | 19.22x | 0.25x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.26x | 32.85x | 10.61x | 0.57x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.94x | 53.17x | 98.88x | 7.37x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACCO's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +76.3% | +8.1% | +11.3% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +58.1% | +6.5% | +3.2% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +81.8% | +4.7% | +5.5% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | +97.2% | +5.7% | +6.1% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 1.39x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | $807M | -$1.1B | $856M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $64M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $921M | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.52x | 545.03x | 33.19x | 2.50x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,075 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs ACCO's +22.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs ACCO's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | +12.0% | +82.8% | +12.1% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.0% | +80.7% | +307.0% | +22.8% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.0% | +625.9% | +329.8% | -4.4% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.4% | +1328.9% | +418.3% | -39.3% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.5% | +23902.3% | +11090.7% | -35.1% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +93.6% | +62.6% | -1.5% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs ACCO's 94.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.73x | 2.30x | 1.33x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.75 | $216.80 | $430.57 | $4.29 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $112.28 | $96.88 | $2.81 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +97.6% | +94.9% | +94.6% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 60.7 | 81.2 | 74.3 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 378K | 164.5M | 36.4M | 1.2M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LYTS and NVDA and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $278.83 | $310.86 | $8.00 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 79 | 70 | 7 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.0% | — | +7.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | $0.04 | — | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LYTS vs NVDA vs AMD vs ACCO vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -39.
3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus ACCO's -35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning AMD is approximately 73% more volatile than ACCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 100. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 97. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC?
In this comparison, ACCO (7.
1% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NVDA, AMD, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LYTS or NVDA or AMD or ACCO or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +108. 5%, AMD: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYTS and NVDA and AMD and ACCO and INTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (LYTS (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and AMD (Technology) and ACCO (Industrials) and INTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LYTS, ACCO pay a dividend while NVDA, AMD, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.