Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Business Equipment & Supplies
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1.46B | $1.11B | $554M | $1.70B | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.13B | $3.75B | $615M | $3.59B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $-25M | $47M | $-15M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 38.7% | 60.5% | 39.9% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 2.0% | 10.1% | 4.6% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 9.0x | 8.5x | 8.6x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $491M | $1.81B | $124M | $1.63B | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $328M | $194M | $76M | $209M | $40M |
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| La-Z-Boy Incorporat… (LZB) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 1.91x
- Beta 0.97, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.91x
- Beta 0.97 vs ETH's 2.91
Among these 5 stocks, MLKN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ETH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.20 vs HNI's 3.40
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.9x)
- 8.4% margin vs MLKN's -0.7%
HNI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
FLXS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs LZB's 58.2%
- +80.1% vs HNI's -17.7%
- 7.5% ROA vs MLKN's -0.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs MLKN's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MLKN's 4.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs HNI's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs MLKN's -0.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.3% |
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETH leads 1 • MLKN leads 1 • LZB leads 0 • HNI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 8.2x FLXS's $458M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLKN's -0.7%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $3.7B | $615M | $3.6B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $145M | $70M | $323M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | -$25M | $47M | -$15M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $70M | $20M | $8M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +38.7% | +60.5% | +39.9% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +2.0% | +10.1% | +4.6% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -0.7% | +8.4% | -0.4% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +1.9% | +0.0% | +0.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -1.6% | — | +124.7% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | -75.5% | -28.1% | -100.0% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MLKN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 65% valuation discount to HNI's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs HNI's 12.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.1B | $554M | $1.7B | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.7B | $602M | $3.1B | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.13x | -30.91x | 10.84x | 31.26x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.52x | 9.00x | 8.55x | 8.57x | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.10x | — | 0.25x | 12.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.23x | 14.29x | 9.71x | 9.01x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 0.30x | 0.90x | 0.60x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 0.85x | 1.16x | 0.92x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.88x | 10.92x | 9999.00x | 8.06x | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLKN. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ETH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -1.8% | +10.0% | -1.2% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | -0.6% | +6.4% | -0.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +1.3% | +7.6% | +7.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +1.5% | +10.5% | +9.3% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 1.36x | 0.26x | 0.89x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $162M | $1.6B | $47M | $1.4B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $328M | $194M | $76M | $209M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491M | $1.8B | $124M | $1.6B | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 241.20x | 0.66x | 721.00x | 2.01x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,609 for MLKN. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs HNI's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs ETH's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | -9.3% | -26.1% | -17.7% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.9% | +6.9% | +28.9% | -17.7% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | +11.1% | -33.4% | +42.6% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | -53.9% | -30.3% | -7.3% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.2% | -23.2% | -18.8% | +9.3% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +3.6% | -12.7% | +12.5% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LZB and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LZB is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.69x | 2.91x | 1.07x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.49 | $23.18 | $45.78 | $53.29 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.03 | $13.77 | $16.85 | $31.41 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +70.7% | +47.6% | +65.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 44.2 | 55.8 | 34.4 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 382K | 845K | 4.6M | 743K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LZB and MLKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LZB as "Buy", MLKN as "Hold", ETH as "Hold", HNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.8% upside for HNI (target: $95) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, MLKN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.58% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $95.00 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 10 | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +4.6% | +0.0% | +3.7% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $0.75 | $0.00 | $1.29 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +7.6% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ETH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LZB vs MLKN vs ETH vs HNI vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus HNI Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -53. 9% for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LZB returned +58. 2% versus MLKN's -23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 201% more volatile than LZB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -147. 7% for MillerKnoll, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNI leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -1. 0% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus 1. 4% for MLKN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus HNI Corporation's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for La-Z-Boy Incorporated — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNI: 173. 8% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS?
In this comparison, MLKN (4.
6% yield), HNI (3. 7% yield), LZB (2. 3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ETH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LZB or MLKN or ETH or HNI or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 2. 3% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZB: +58. 2%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZB and MLKN and ETH and HNI and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZB (Consumer Cyclical) and MLKN (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and HNI (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZB is a small-cap deep-value stock; MLKN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. LZB, MLKN, HNI, FLXS pay a dividend while ETH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.