Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LZM logo
LZM
PPTA logo
PPTA
SBSW logo
SBSW
KO logo
KO
NEM logo
NEM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LZM
Lifezone Metals Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$353M
5Y Perf.-60.3%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.01B
5Y Perf.+407.2%
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • ZA
Market Cap$6.98B
5Y Perf.-21.4%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+39.5%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$111.05B
5Y Perf.+61.6%

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LZM logoLZM
PPTA logoPPTA
SBSW logoSBSW
KO logoKO
NEM logoNEM
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsOther Precious MetalsGoldBeverages - Non-AlcoholicGold
Market Cap$353M$3.01B$6.98B$355.61B$111.05B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$0.00$238.26B$49.28B$17.23B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$-141M$-12.39B$13.70B$5.26B
Gross Margin-51.3%21.2%61.7%52.1%
Operating Margin-55.8%18.9%29.3%49.3%
Forward P/E0.2x25.3x9.7x
Total Debt$58M$244K$44.34B$45.49B$474M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$774M$17.16B$10.27B$7.65B

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LZM
PPTA
SBSW
KO
NEM
StockDec 21Jun 26Return
Lifezone Metals Lim… (LZM)10039.7-60.3%
Perpetua Resources … (PPTA)100507.2+407.2%
Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW)10078.6-21.4%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100139.5+39.5%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100161.6+61.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NEM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LZM and PPTA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇NEM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LZM
Lifezone Metals Limited
The Growth Leader

LZM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 6.5% revenue growth vs PPTA's -6.7%
Best for: growth
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

PPTA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 197.4% 10Y total return vs NEM's 212.4%
  • +83.6% vs LZM's -5.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SBSW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs LZM's -36.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.1%
Best for: income & stability
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Growth Play

NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
  • PEG 0.76 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 1.45, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.72x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLZM logoLZM6.5% revenue growth vs PPTA's -6.7%
ValueNEM logoNEMLower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.76 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsNEM logoNEM30.5% margin vs LZM's -50.0%
Stability / SafetyNEM logoNEMBeta 1.45 vs LZM's 2.57, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PPTA logoPPTA+83.6% vs LZM's -5.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs LZM's -36.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.1%

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Gold & Precious Metals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Gold & Precious Metals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
LZMLifezone Metals Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

PPTAPerpetua Resources Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBSWSibanye Stillwater Limited
FY 2024
Pgm Mining Activities
35.7%$59.5B
Gold Mining Activities
22.3%$37.1B
Platinum Mining Activities
12.3%$20.6B
Palladium Mining Activities
11.9%$19.9B
Rhodium Mining Activities
8.8%$14.7B
Chrome Mining Activities
3.6%$6.1B
Nickel Mining Activities
2.2%$3.6B
Other (3)
3.2%$5.3B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGLZM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBSW and PPTA operate at a comparable scale, with $238.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LZM's -50.0%. On growth, LZM holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$0$238.3B$49.3B$17.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$64M-$146M$63.5B$15.5B$12.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M-$141M-$12.4B$13.7B$5.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$66M-$152M-$9.5B$12.6B$12.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-51.3%+21.2%+61.7%+52.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-55.8%+18.9%+29.3%+49.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-50.0%-5.2%+27.8%+30.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-55.3%-4.0%+25.5%+75.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.1%+25.4%+12.1%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%-4.3%-10.0%+18.2%-100.0%
NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBSW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.6x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 42% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEM offers better value at 1.22x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$353M$3.0B$7.0B$355.6B$111.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$392M$2.2B$8.6B$390.8B$103.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.12x-22.31x-23.69x27.18x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.20x25.27x9.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.44x26.39x7.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue334.25x0.95x7.42x5.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.31x2.61x2.58x10.40x3.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.63x67.15x15.22x
SBSW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-61 for LZM. PPTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs PPTA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.9%-20.7%-28.1%+41.1%+15.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-36.2%-20.2%-8.3%+13.1%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-13.1%-125.8%+22.9%+15.8%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.8%-25.9%+19.1%+17.3%+20.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–921679
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x0.00x1.00x1.33x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38M-$773M$27.2B$35.2B-$7.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$774M$17.2B$10.3B$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$58M$244,000$44.3B$45.5B$474M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.30x1.31x10.70x50.54x
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PPTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PPTA five years ago would be worth $27,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,986 for LZM. Over the past 12 months, PPTA leads with a +83.6% total return vs LZM's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPTA at 74.5% vs LZM's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.3%-1.8%-29.7%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.1%+83.6%+41.7%+17.2%+81.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.3%+431.8%+44.4%+47.0%+146.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.1%+175.3%-32.2%+65.6%+54.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.1%+197.4%+14.5%+121.1%+212.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.4%+74.5%+13.0%+13.7%+35.1%
PPTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LZM's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs SBSW's 46.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.57x2.33x2.28x-0.20x1.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.40$37.37$21.29$84.04$134.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.07$11.68$6.72$65.35$54.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.4%+64.5%+46.3%+98.3%+74.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.841.634.860.638.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded757K1.5M4.5M12.7M6.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LZM as "Buy", PPTA as "Buy", SBSW as "Hold", KO as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.0% upside for SBSW (target: $21) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SBSW's 0.25%.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…PPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$43.50$21.40$86.13$143.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts23124836
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+2.5%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0560
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$2.04$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%+2.1%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LZM vs PPTA vs SBSW vs KO vs NEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) is the stronger pick with 652.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 15.

6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Newmont Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

Over the past 5 years, Perpetua Resources Corp.

(PPTA) delivered a total return of +175. 3%, compared to -60. 1% for Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEM returned +212. 4% versus LZM's -60. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Lifezone Metals Limited's 2. 57β — meaning LZM is approximately -1386% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) is pulling ahead at 652.

2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to -590. 9% for Perpetua Resources Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

1% net margin versus -1289. 2% for Lifezone Metals Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus -1724. 9% for LZM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 25. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBSW: 117. 0% to $21. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), NEM (1. 0% yield), SBSW (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LZM, PPTA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LZM or PPTA or SBSW or KO or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, LZM: -60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LZM and PPTA and SBSW and KO and NEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (LZM (Basic Materials) and PPTA (Basic Materials) and SBSW (Basic Materials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NEM (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LZM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PPTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. KO, NEM pay a dividend while LZM, PPTA, SBSW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.