Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAGH vs PUBM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
MAGH vs PUBM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $225M | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $282M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43K | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | -7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7161.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $760K | $146M |
Quick Verdict: MAGH vs PUBM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAGH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 66.5% 10Y total return vs PUBM's -65.2%
- 0.3% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
- 0.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
PUBM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth -234.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 1.39x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.39x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% revenue growth vs MAGH's -36.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.7% vs 389.8%) | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs PUBM's +2.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.5% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 2.7% vs -6.8% |
MAGH vs PUBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAGH vs PUBM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MAGH and PUBM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PUBM is the larger business by revenue, generating $282M annually — 18.3x MAGH's $15M. MAGH is the more profitable business, keeping 0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $282M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PUBM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PUBM's 14.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAGH's 1840.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $384M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7161.08x | -33.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1840.75x | 14.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.66x | 1.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 501.65x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAGH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAGH delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. PUBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAGH's 3.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUBM scores 5/9 vs MAGH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | -7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | -5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.90x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759,891 | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $44M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.78x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAGH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAGH five years ago would be worth $16,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,295 for PUBM. Over the past 12 months, MAGH leads with a +66.5% total return vs PUBM's +2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAGH at 18.5% vs PUBM's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.5% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -18.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -77.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -65.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MAGH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAGH is the less volatile stock with a -1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PUBM's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAGH currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs PUBM's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.43x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.94 | $13.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $6.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 92.2 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 746K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MAGH is the only dividend payer here at 0.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.6% |
MAGH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PUBM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MAGH vs PUBM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAGH or PUBM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PubMatic, Inc.
(PUBM) is the stronger pick with -2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) offers the better valuation at 7161. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MAGH or PUBM?
Over the past 5 years, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -77. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAGH returned +66. 5% versus PUBM's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MAGH or PUBM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
43β versus PubMatic, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning PUBM is approximately -205% more volatile than MAGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 4% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MAGH or PUBM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PubMatic, Inc.
(PUBM) is pulling ahead at -2. 9% versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares grew EPS -97. 9% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MAGH or PUBM?
Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
3% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAGH leads at 0. 5% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PUBM leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MAGH or PUBM?
In this comparison, MAGH (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PUBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MAGH or PUBM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
43)). PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAGH: +66. 5%, PUBM: -65. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MAGH and PUBM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAGH (Industrials) and PUBM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.