Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Banks - Regional
Discount Stores
Packaged Foods
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Banks - Regional | Discount Stores | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $607M | $398M | $302M | $964.49B | $316M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $352M | $151M | $725.30B | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-19M | $11M | $23.06B | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 33.9% | 63.5% | 25.0% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | -5.0% | 9.1% | 4.2% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | 139.7x | 51.7x | 30.0x | 41.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $14M | $5M | $179M | $67.09B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $90M | $116M | $10.73B | $208M |
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| The Honest Company,… (HNST) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 254.6 | +154.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 447.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
- 39.2% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
HNST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BRBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.48 vs BYND's 1.79
Among these 5 stocks, WMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BYND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 92.2% margin vs HNST's -5.4%
- 39.3% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.2% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs HNST's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs BYND's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, vs WMT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.3% vs BYND's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.5% |
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAMA leads in 2 of 6 categories
BRBS leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • HNST leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 4815.8x BRBS's $151M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNST's -5.4%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $352M | $151M | $725.3B | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$10M | $15M | $41.4B | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$19M | $11M | $23.1B | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $20M | $9M | $12.6B | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +33.9% | +63.5% | +25.0% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -5.0% | +9.1% | +4.2% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -5.4% | +7.1% | +3.2% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +5.8% | +6.1% | +1.7% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.7% | -19.7% | — | +7.3% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | -101.3% | +2.6% | +19.6% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HNST and WMT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.0x trailing earnings, BRBS trades at a 74% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.03x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $398M | $302M | $964.5B | $316M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $601M | $314M | $365M | $1.02T | $616M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 114.69x | -25.86x | 30.00x | 44.32x | -0.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 139.74x | 51.71x | — | 41.66x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 71.07x | — | — | 4.03x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.90x | — | 24.32x | 23.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.07x | 2.00x | 1.35x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.73x | 2.37x | 1.08x | 9.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.14x | 29.28x | 80.64x | 64.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HNST. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAMA scores 6/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -10.6% | +3.1% | +22.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -8.2% | +0.4% | +8.1% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | -13.5% | +2.0% | +14.4% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | -10.2% | +0.5% | +17.5% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.03x | 0.55x | 0.63x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$85M | $63M | $56.4B | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $90M | $116M | $10.7B | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $5M | $179M | $67.1B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.57x | -26.35x | 0.23x | 11.70x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs BYND's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs BYND's -62.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +38.7% | -9.1% | +7.7% | -22.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.3% | -23.9% | +21.0% | +28.6% | -79.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +452.2% | +119.4% | -54.7% | +140.7% | -94.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -80.3% | -70.4% | +167.1% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -77.4% | -15.5% | +447.2% | -99.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +76.8% | +29.9% | -23.2% | +34.0% | -62.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.45x | 0.48x | -0.00x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $5.28 | $4.79 | $135.16 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $2.07 | $3.23 | $93.43 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +68.6% | +68.9% | +89.5% | +8.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 57.4 | 45.7 | 45.9 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 1.6M | 335K | 18.3M | 62.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BRBS and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", HNST as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 6439.0% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 5.0% for HNST (target: $4). For income investors, BRBS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $3.80 | — | $139.44 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | — | 66 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.5% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 52 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.21 | $0.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
MAMA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BRBS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs WMT vs BYND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) offers the better valuation at 30. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
On trailing P/E, Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the cheapest at 30. 0x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, Walmart Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 3. 79x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus BYND's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning BYND is approximately -44753% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 63% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 135. 5% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for The Honest Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -4. 2% for The Honest Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRBS leads at 9. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRBS leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 79x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Walmart Inc. (WMT) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 98. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 6439. 0% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND?
In this comparison, BRBS (6.
5% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA, HNST, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or WMT or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +447. 2%, BYND: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMA and HNST and BRBS and WMT and BYND?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and HNST (Consumer Cyclical) and BRBS (Financial Services) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and BYND (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRBS, WMT pay a dividend while MAMA, HNST, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.