Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MAMA logo
MAMA
SMPL logo
SMPL
JPM logo
JPM
NOMD logo
NOMD
HAIN logo
HAIN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$607M
5Y Perf.+436.3%
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-66.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+111.3%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.48B
5Y Perf.-60.1%
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-98.4%

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAMA logoMAMA
SMPL logoSMPL
JPM logoJPM
NOMD logoNOMD
HAIN logoHAIN
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged FoodsBanks - DiversifiedPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$607M$1.25B$896.00B$1.48B$57M
Revenue (TTM)$189M$1.45B$280.33B$3.00B$1.45B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$91M$57.05B$133M$-516M
Gross Margin24.5%34.0%60.0%26.6%19.3%
Operating Margin4.3%14.4%25.9%10.6%2.2%
Forward P/E139.7x7.5x14.4x6.9x
Total Debt$14M$304M$942.38B$2.29B$779M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$98M$343.34B$325M$54M

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAMA
SMPL
JPM
NOMD
HAIN
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA)100536.3+436.3%
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10033.5-66.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100211.3+111.3%
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD)10039.9-60.1%
The Hain Celestial … (HAIN)1001.6-98.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MAMA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. NOMD also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MAMA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.
The Growth Play

MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 39.2% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
  • +87.3% vs HAIN's -62.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Defensive Pick

SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
  • PEG 0.32 vs JPM's 0.81
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 20.4% margin vs HAIN's -35.5%
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 6.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
The Income Pick

NOMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 6.7%
  • Beta 0.10, yield 6.7%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.10 vs HAIN's 1.81, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and defensive
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
The Consumer Defensive Pick

Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMAMA logoMAMA39.2% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
ValueNOMD logoNOMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs HAIN's -35.5%
Stability / SafetyNOMD logoNOMDBeta 0.10 vs HAIN's 1.81, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 6.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MAMA logoMAMA+87.3% vs HAIN's -62.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MAMA logoMAMA7.9% ROA vs HAIN's -35.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs 2.9%

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MAMAMama's Creations, Inc.
FY 2026
Reportable Segment
100.0%$172M
SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
NOMDNomad Foods Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

HAINThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Meal Preparation
41.0%$640M
Snacks
23.8%$371M
Grocery
15.7%$245M
Baby/Kids
15.5%$242M
Personal Care
4.0%$63M

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMAMALAGGINGNOMD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1481.5x MAMA's $189M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -35.5%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$189M$1.4B$280.3B$3.0B$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$231M$81.4B$429M$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$91M$57.0B$133M-$516M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$174M$100.9B$227M$42M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+34.0%+60.0%+26.6%+19.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.3%+14.4%+25.9%+10.6%+2.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%+6.3%+20.4%+4.4%-35.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.8%+12.0%+36.0%+7.6%+2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.7%-0.3%-4.4%-13.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+51.3%-31.6%+16.0%0.0%+21.5%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 91% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.52x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
Market CapShares × price$607M$1.3B$896.0B$1.5B$57M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$601M$1.5B$1.50T$3.8B$782M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS114.69x12.32x16.00x9.91x-0.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.139.74x7.52x14.40x6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate71.07x0.52x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple40.90x6.02x18.36x7.47x8.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.53x0.86x3.20x0.42x0.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.73x0.71x2.47x0.54x0.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF62.14x7.94x8.88x5.08x
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MAMA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-141 for HAIN. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAMA scores 6/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.0%+5.2%+15.9%+5.3%-140.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.9%+3.7%+1.3%+2.1%-35.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.8%+8.1%+4.5%+5.5%+2.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.7%+9.4%+8.9%+6.2%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965543
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x0.17x2.60x0.92x1.64x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$206M$599.0B$2.0B$725M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$98M$343.3B$325M$54M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$304M$942.4B$2.3B$779M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.57x6.77x0.74x2.64x0.51x
MAMA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $152 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs HAIN's -62.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs HAIN's -62.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.3%-35.7%-0.5%-11.4%-40.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.3%-62.0%+21.8%-36.7%-62.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+452.2%-64.7%+138.2%-32.0%-94.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%-64.6%+118.2%-60.9%-98.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%+4.7%+465.8%+27.5%-98.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+76.8%-29.3%+33.6%-12.1%-62.6%
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 29.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x0.19x0.94x0.10x1.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.85$34.19$337.25$18.33$2.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.75$10.21$262.71$8.99$0.55
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.5%+36.8%+95.1%+56.9%+29.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.658.459.159.535.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded427K2.8M7.0M1.3M886K
Evenly matched — JPM and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 85.7% upside for HAIN (target: $1) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, NOMD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.74% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…HAIN logoHAINThe Hain Celestia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$15.00$339.75$13.50$1.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts724611344
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+6.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00152
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$0.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.1%+3.9%+15.8%+2.5%
Evenly matched — JPM and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MAMA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallMama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAMA vs SMPL vs JPM vs NOMD vs HAIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.

9x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 32x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -98. 5% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus HAIN's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning HAIN is approximately 1624% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mama's Creations, Inc. grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 3. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 132. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAIN: 85. 7% to $1. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN?

In this comparison, NOMD (6.

7% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA, SMPL, HAIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MAMA or SMPL or JPM or NOMD or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10), 6. 7% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +27. 5%, HAIN: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MAMA and SMPL and JPM and NOMD and HAIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and NOMD (Consumer Defensive) and HAIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, NOMD pay a dividend while MAMA, SMPL, HAIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.