MAN vs TBI

For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.

(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) delivered a total return of -64. 9%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAN returned -30. 8% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 10% more volatile than MAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.

(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 1% net margin versus -3. 0% for TrueBlue, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAN leads at 1. 3% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBI leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAN: 24.

5% to $37. 86.

In this comparison, MAN (4.

7% yield) pays a dividend. TBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -30. 8%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MAN pays a dividend while TBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.