MANH vs AMZN

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the cheapest at 38. 3x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Manhattan Associates, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to +4. 3% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus MANH's +145. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 37% more volatile than MANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MANH leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANH leads at 55. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) trades at 26. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MANH: 43. 1% to $197. 25.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, MANH: +145. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MANH (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.