Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.50B
5Y Perf.+62.4%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+122.1%
WMT
Walmart Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.9%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$559.27B
5Y Perf.+261.8%

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MANH logoMANH
AMZN logoAMZN
WMT logoWMT
ORCL logoORCL
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$8.50B$2.92T$1.04T$559.27B
Revenue (TTM)$1.10B$742.78B$703.06B$64.08B
Net Income (TTM)$217M$90.80B$22.91B$16.21B
Gross Margin55.6%50.6%24.9%66.4%
Operating Margin25.6%11.5%4.1%30.8%
Forward P/E26.8x34.8x44.7x26.0x
Total Debt$112M$152.99B$67.09B$104.10B
Cash & Equiv.$329M$86.81B$10.73B$10.79B

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MANH
AMZN
WMT
ORCL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Manhattan Associate… (MANH)100162.4+62.4%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100222.1+122.1%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)100314.9+214.9%
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)100361.8+261.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Oracle Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. MANH and WMT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MANH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 35.7%, current ratio 1.28x
  • 28.0% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs 14.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • PEG 1.24 vs WMT's 4.06
  • 12.4% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
  • Lower P/E (34.8x vs 44.7x), PEG 1.24 vs 4.06
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick

WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
  • 499.5% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • Beta 0.12, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.79x
  • Beta 0.12 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
The Quality Compounder

ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 25.3% margin vs WMT's 3.3%
  • 0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMZN logoAMZN12.4% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
ValueAMZN logoAMZNLower P/E (34.8x vs 44.7x), PEG 1.24 vs 4.06
Quality / MarginsORCL logoORCL25.3% margin vs WMT's 3.3%
Stability / SafetyWMT logoWMTBeta 0.12 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
DividendsORCL logoORCL0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+43.7% vs MANH's -21.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MANH logoMANH28.0% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs 14.7%

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MANHManhattan Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
46.5%$503M
Cloud Subscriptions
37.7%$408M
Maintenance
12.0%$130M
Hardware
2.4%$25M
License and Maintenance
1.4%$15M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
WMTWalmart Inc.
FY 2025
Walmart U S
68.6%$462.4B
Walmart International
18.1%$121.9B
Sams Club
13.4%$90.2B
ORCLOracle Corporation
FY 2025
Cloud And License Business
85.8%$49.2B
Services Business
9.1%$5.2B
Hardware Business
5.1%$2.9B

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMANHLAGGINGWMT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 674.7x MANH's $1.1B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$742.8B$703.1B$64.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$288M$155.9B$42.8B$26.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$217M$90.8B$22.9B$16.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$380M-$2.5B$15.3B-$24.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%+50.6%+24.9%+66.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.6%+11.5%+4.1%+30.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.7%+12.2%+3.3%+25.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+34.5%-0.3%+2.2%-38.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.4%+16.6%+5.8%+21.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.5%+74.8%+35.1%+24.5%
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 21% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
Market CapShares × price$8.5B$2.92T$1.04T$559.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.3B$2.98T$1.09T$652.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS39.88x37.82x47.69x44.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.79x34.77x44.71x25.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.86x1.35x4.33x6.31x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.67x20.47x24.85x27.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.86x4.07x1.46x9.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share27.85x7.14x10.45x26.59x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.74x378.98x24.97x
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MANH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. MANH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+78.2%+23.3%+22.3%+56.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+28.0%+11.5%+7.9%+8.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+14.7%+14.7%+12.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+76.3%+15.3%+17.5%+14.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.37x0.67x4.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$216M$66.2B$56.4B$93.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$329M$86.8B$10.7B$10.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$112M$153.0B$67.1B$104.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense39.96x11.85x5.44x
MANH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,805 for MANH. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs MANH's -21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs MANH's -5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.2%+19.7%+15.7%-0.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-21.9%+43.7%+32.7%+31.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.3%+156.2%+160.5%+106.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.1%+64.8%+186.9%+151.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+145.1%+697.8%+499.5%+425.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.4%+36.8%+37.6%+27.3%
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ORCL's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.10x1.51x0.12x1.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$247.22$278.56$134.69$345.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$119.06$185.01$91.89$134.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+58.1%+97.3%+96.7%+56.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.681.155.968.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded678K45.5M17.2M26.3M
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WMT and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MANH as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.4% upside for MANH (target: $197) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, ORCL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.85% vs WMT's 0.72%.

MetricMANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.ORCL logoORCLOracle Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$197.25$306.77$137.04$257.19
# AnalystsCovering analysts15946486
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises23718
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.94$1.65
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.7%0.0%+0.8%+0.3%
Evenly matched — WMT and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ORCL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AMZN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MANH vs AMZN vs WMT vs ORCL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

On trailing P/E, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Oracle Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +8. 1% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus MANH's +145. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 1259% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MANH leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) trades at 26. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MANH: 37. 4% to $197. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL?

In this comparison, ORCL (0.

9% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. MANH, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MANH or AMZN or WMT or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, MANH: +145. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MANH and AMZN and WMT and ORCL?

These companies operate in different sectors (MANH (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

WMT, ORCL pay a dividend while MANH, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MANH

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ORCL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MANH and AMZN and WMT and ORCL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MANH: 7.4% · AMZN: 16.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(MANH: 19.7% · AMZN: 12.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MANH: 39.9x · AMZN: 37.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.