Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAPS vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
MAPS vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $18M | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $175M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 94.9% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $20M |
MAPS vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAPS vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.57
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 20.1%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.34x
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 87.8% 10Y total return vs MAPS's -96.2%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MAPS's -5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MAPS's -5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs MAPS's 1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs MAPS's -67.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs MAPS's 1.0%, ROIC 7.2% vs 0.6% |
MAPS vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAPS vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $175M annually — 1.8x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAPS's 1.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $175M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.9% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MAPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 76% valuation discount to MAPS's 18.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$18M | $674M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.69x | 4.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.27x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for MAPS. MAPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.5% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $234 for MAPS. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +8.6% total return vs MAPS's -67.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -2.6% vs MAPS's -22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.7% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.2% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.8% | -7.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.1% | -2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAPS and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 74.0% from its 52-week high vs MAPS's 27.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.36 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.5% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.9 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 498K |
Analyst Outlook
MAPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 18.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAPS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MAPS vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAPS or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAPS or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus WM Technology, Inc. at 18. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAPS or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -97. 7% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus MAPS's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAPS or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WM Technology, Inc.
(MAPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 46% more volatile than MAPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAPS or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for WM Technology, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAPS or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 1. 1% for WM Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 4% for MAPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAPS leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MAPS or TPVG?
In this comparison, TPVG (18.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MAPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MAPS or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, MAPS: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MAPS and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAPS (Technology) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while MAPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare TPVG vs HRZN
HRZN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to TPVG.
Compare MAPS vs IIPR
IIPR overlaps with MAPS in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With HRZN + HTGC
HRZN and HTGC are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.