Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAPS vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-96.2%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-50.2%

MAPS vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAPS logoMAPS
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationAsset Management
Market Cap$18M$226M
Revenue (TTM)$175M$97M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$46M
Gross Margin94.9%83.5%
Operating Margin0.4%77.9%
Forward P/E18.7x6.0x
Total Debt$27M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$62M$20M

MAPS vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAPS
TPVG
StockMay 20Apr 26Return
WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS)1003.8-96.2%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10049.8-50.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAPS vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. WM Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
The Income Pick

MAPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.57
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 20.1%, current ratio 2.34x
  • Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.34x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
  • 87.8% 10Y total return vs MAPS's -96.2%
  • 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MAPS's -5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPVG logoTPVG36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MAPS's -5.3%
ValueTPVG logoTPVGLower P/E (6.0x vs 18.7x)
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs MAPS's 1.1%
Stability / SafetyMAPS logoMAPSBeta 0.57 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG18.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TPVG logoTPVG+8.6% vs MAPS's -67.2%
Efficiency (ROA)TPVG logoTPVG5.6% ROA vs MAPS's 1.0%, ROIC 7.2% vs 0.6%

MAPS vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MAPSWM Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
91.2%$159M
Product and Service, Other
8.8%$15M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

MAPS vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGMAPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MAPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $175M annually — 1.8x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAPS's 1.1%.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$175M$97M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$63M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$46M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$14M$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.9%+83.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%+77.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.1%+50.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.9%-58.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%-100.0%
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 76% valuation discount to MAPS's 18.7x P/E.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$18M$226M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$18M$674M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.69x4.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-1.27x8.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x2.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.68x
MAPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for MAPS. MAPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.5%+13.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.5%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$36M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$27M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.15x
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $234 for MAPS. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +8.6% total return vs MAPS's -67.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -2.6% vs MAPS's -22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.7%-12.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.2%+8.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.8%-7.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-19.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+87.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.1%-2.6%
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MAPS and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MAPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 74.0% from its 52-week high vs MAPS's 27.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.36$7.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.32$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.5%+74.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.955.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.9M498K
Evenly matched — MAPS and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MAPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 18.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMAPS logoMAPSWM Technology, In…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts12
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+18.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
MAPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TPVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAPS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAPS vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAPS or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAPS or TPVG?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus WM Technology, Inc. at 18. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAPS or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -97. 7% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus MAPS's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAPS or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WM Technology, Inc.

(MAPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 46% more volatile than MAPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAPS or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for WM Technology, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAPS or TPVG?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 1. 1% for WM Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 4% for MAPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAPS leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MAPS or TPVG?

In this comparison, TPVG (18.

4% yield) pays a dividend. MAPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is MAPS or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, MAPS: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MAPS and TPVG?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAPS (Technology) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while MAPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MAPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MAPS and TPVG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MAPS: -9.7% · TPVG: 36.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MAPS: 18.7x · TPVG: 4.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.