MARA vs HUT

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +360. 2%, compared to -58. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUT returned +505. 6% versus MARA's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 11β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 45% more volatile than MARA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hut 8 Corp. grew EPS -162. 9% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the more profitable company, earning -144. 6% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps -144. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MARA leads at -90. 6% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MARA leads at -47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+505. 6% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUT: +505. 6%, MARA: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.