Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Software - Application
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $48M | $121.12B | $56.86B | $51.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-432K | $61.36B | $6.63B | $490M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $40M | $3.22B | $-12.59B |
| Gross Margin | 47.8% | 1.9% | 81.8% | 68.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.1% | 0.9% | 13.7% | -28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.7x | — | 67.8x | 2.5x |
| Total Debt | $213K | $5.33B | $7.66B | $8.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1.45B | $11.62B | $2.30B |
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metalpha Technology… (MATH) | 100 | 34.5 | -65.5% |
| Galaxy Digital (GLXY) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 165.9%, EPS growth 472.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.17x
- 165.9% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0%
- 35.7% margin vs MSTR's -25.7%
GLXY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +36.5% vs MSTR's -51.6%
COIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 10.3% ROA vs MSTR's -19.8%, ROIC 3.6% vs -9.9%
MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
- 9.2% 10Y total return vs GLXY's 36.5%
- Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
- 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 165.9% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.7% margin vs MSTR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs GLXY's 3.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.5% vs MSTR's -51.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs MSTR's -19.8%, ROIC 3.6% vs -9.9% |
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MATH leads 1 • GLXY leads 0 • COIN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MATH and COIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXY and MATH operate at a comparable scale, with $61.4B and -$432,000 in trailing revenue. MATH is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$432,000 | $61.4B | $6.6B | $490M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $609M | $2.3B | -$14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $40M | $3.2B | -$12.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $55M | $326M | $7.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +1.9% | +81.8% | +68.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +0.9% | +13.7% | -28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | -0.4% | +19.0% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -2.4% | +36.6% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -4.7% | +4.4% | -132.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MATH and MSTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, MATH trades at a 94% valuation discount to COIN's 44.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MATH's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLXY's 205.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $121.1B | $56.9B | $51.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $125.0B | $52.9B | $57.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.71x | -58.72x | 44.49x | -12.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 67.78x | 2.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.36x | 205.20x | 48.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 1.97x | 8.57x | 108.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 39.91x | 3.84x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1952.18x | — | 23.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-57 for MATH. MATH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLXY's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MATH scores 7/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.6% | +1.5% | +20.1% | -25.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | +0.4% | +10.3% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +55.8% | +9.2% | +3.6% | -9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +65.3% | +16.2% | +4.3% | -12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.76x | 0.52x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $3.9B | -$4.0B | $6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1.4B | $11.6B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $212,689 | $5.3B | $7.7B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -70.04x | 9.71x | 47.61x | 9.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $30,671 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,710 for COIN. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +36.5% total return vs MSTR's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 85.1% vs MATH's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +25.7% | -16.3% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.2% | +36.5% | +0.5% | -51.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | +36.5% | +240.7% | +533.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +36.5% | -22.9% | +206.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.9% | +36.5% | -39.7% | +923.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +10.9% | +50.5% | +85.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MATH and GLXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLXY currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs MATH's 26.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 3.71x | 3.17x | 2.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $45.92 | $444.65 | $457.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $16.43 | $139.36 | $104.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.6% | +67.8% | +44.5% | +40.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 70.1 | 53.7 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 5.4M | 11.2M | 19.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLXY as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for MSTR (target: $281) vs 20.3% for GLXY (target: $37). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.43 | $243.33 | $280.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 37 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). MATH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger pick with 165.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galaxy Digital (GLXY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
On trailing P/E, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 44. 5x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +206.
7%, compared to -22. 9% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +923. 1% versus MATH's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 71β — meaning GLXY is approximately 401% more volatile than MATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Galaxy Digital — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is pulling ahead at 165.
9% versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalpha Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 472. 7% year-over-year, compared to -184. 1% for Galaxy Digital. Over a 3-year CAGR, MATH leads at 613. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the more profitable company, earning 35.
7% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MATH leads at 39. 1% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.
5x forward P/E versus 67. 8x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 65. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 50. 3% to $280. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?
In this comparison, MSTR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MATH, GLXY, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +923. 1% 10Y return). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +923. 1%, COIN: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MATH and GLXY and COIN and MSTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MATH (Industrials) and GLXY (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MATH is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while MATH, GLXY, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.