Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-65.5%
GLXY
Galaxy Digital

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$121.12B
5Y Perf.+71.5%
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$56.86B
5Y Perf.-19.7%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$51.87B
5Y Perf.-49.4%

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MATH logoMATH
GLXY logoGLXY
COIN logoCOIN
MSTR logoMSTR
IndustryAirlines, Airports & Air ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$48M$121.12B$56.86B$51.87B
Revenue (TTM)$-432K$61.36B$6.63B$490M
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$40M$3.22B$-12.59B
Gross Margin47.8%1.9%81.8%68.1%
Operating Margin39.1%0.9%13.7%-28.5%
Forward P/E2.7x67.8x2.5x
Total Debt$213K$5.33B$7.66B$8.28B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$1.45B$11.62B$2.30B

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MATH
GLXY
COIN
MSTR
StockMay 25May 26Return
Metalpha Technology… (MATH)10034.5-65.5%
Galaxy Digital (GLXY)100171.5+71.5%
Coinbase Global, In… (COIN)10080.3-19.7%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)10050.6-49.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MATH leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Coinbase Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GLXY and MSTR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited
The Growth Play

MATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 165.9%, EPS growth 472.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.17x
  • 165.9% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0%
  • 35.7% margin vs MSTR's -25.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
The Banking Pick

GLXY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +36.5% vs MSTR's -51.6%
Best for: momentum
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 10.3% ROA vs MSTR's -19.8%, ROIC 3.6% vs -9.9%
Best for: value and efficiency
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
  • 9.2% 10Y total return vs GLXY's 36.5%
  • Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
  • 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMATH logoMATH165.9% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0%
ValueCOIN logoCOINBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMATH logoMATH35.7% margin vs MSTR's -25.7%
Stability / SafetyMATH logoMATHBeta 0.74 vs GLXY's 3.71, lower leverage
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GLXY logoGLXY+36.5% vs MSTR's -51.6%
Efficiency (ROA)COIN logoCOIN10.3% ROA vs MSTR's -19.8%, ROIC 3.6% vs -9.9%

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

GLXYGalaxy Digital

Segment breakdown not available.

COINCoinbase Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing, Consumer, Net
47.9%$3.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Stablecoin
19.5%$1.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Blockchain Infrastructure Service
9.8%$677M
Subscription and Circulation, Other
8.0%$555M
Bank Servicing, Institutional
6.9%$480M
Other Revenue
4.3%$298M
Bank Servicing, Other
3.6%$253M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSTRLAGGINGCOIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MATH and COIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

GLXY and MATH operate at a comparable scale, with $61.4B and -$432,000 in trailing revenue. MATH is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.7%.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
RevenueTrailing 12 months-$432,000$61.4B$6.6B$490M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M$609M$2.3B-$14.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M$40M$3.2B-$12.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$55M$326M$7.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.8%+1.9%+81.8%+68.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.1%+0.9%+13.7%-28.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+35.7%-0.4%+19.0%-25.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%-2.4%+36.6%+15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%-4.7%+4.4%-132.0%
Evenly matched — MATH and COIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MATH and MSTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.7x trailing earnings, MATH trades at a 94% valuation discount to COIN's 44.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MATH's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLXY's 205.2x.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Market CapShares × price$48M$121.1B$56.9B$51.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$125.0B$52.9B$57.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.71x-58.72x44.49x-12.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.67.78x2.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.88x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.36x205.20x48.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x1.97x8.57x108.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.17x39.91x3.84x1.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1952.18x23.43x
Evenly matched — MATH and MSTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

COIN delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-57 for MATH. MATH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLXY's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MATH scores 7/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-56.6%+1.5%+20.1%-25.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.0%+0.4%+10.3%-19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+55.8%+9.2%+3.6%-9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+65.3%+16.2%+4.3%-12.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97153
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x1.76x0.52x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$3.9B-$4.0B$6.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$1.4B$11.6B$2.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$212,689$5.3B$7.7B$8.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-70.04x9.71x47.61x9.35x
MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $30,671 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,710 for COIN. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +36.5% total return vs MSTR's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 85.1% vs MATH's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-51.9%+25.7%-16.3%+18.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.2%+36.5%+0.5%-51.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.0%+36.5%+240.7%+533.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.5%+36.5%-22.9%+206.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%+36.5%-39.7%+923.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.5%+10.9%+50.5%+85.1%
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MATH and GLXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLXY currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs MATH's 26.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x3.71x3.17x2.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.17$45.92$444.65$457.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$16.43$139.36$104.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.6%+67.8%+44.5%+40.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.970.153.768.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded45K5.4M11.2M19.0M
Evenly matched — MATH and GLXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GLXY as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for MSTR (target: $281) vs 20.3% for GLXY (target: $37). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.43$243.33$280.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts113729
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.4%0.0%
MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). MATH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallStrategy Inc (MSTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MATH vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger pick with 165.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galaxy Digital (GLXY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

On trailing P/E, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the cheapest at 2.

7x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 44. 5x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +206.

7%, compared to -22. 9% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +923. 1% versus MATH's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

74β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 71β — meaning GLXY is approximately 401% more volatile than MATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Galaxy Digital — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is pulling ahead at 165.

9% versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalpha Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 472. 7% year-over-year, compared to -184. 1% for Galaxy Digital. Over a 3-year CAGR, MATH leads at 613. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the more profitable company, earning 35.

7% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MATH leads at 39. 1% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.

5x forward P/E versus 67. 8x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 65. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 50. 3% to $280. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. MATH, GLXY, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MATH or GLXY or COIN or MSTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +923. 1% 10Y return). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +923. 1%, COIN: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MATH and GLXY and COIN and MSTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (MATH (Industrials) and GLXY (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MATH is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while MATH, GLXY, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MATH

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 82%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLXY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSTR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MATH and GLXY and COIN and MSTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MATH: 165.9% · GLXY: 40.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.