Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Solar
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Solar
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Drilling | Solar | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Solar |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.84T | $23.06B | $2.34B | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $176M | $1M | $5.42B | $4.71B | $5.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-565M | $-498M | $1.67B | $638M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | -137.2% | -8.7% | 41.7% | 43.9% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | -290.5% | -367.6% | 33.0% | 31.1% | 0.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 12.0x | 6.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $311M | $0.00 | $499M | $4.49B | $7.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $98M | $2.80B | $76M | $1.91B |
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxeon Solar Techno… (MAXN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 263.8 | +163.8% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) | 100 | 37.1 | -62.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAXN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FSLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 18.2%
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- PEG 0.32 vs FSLR's 0.39
- 49.8% revenue growth vs MAXN's -54.7%
CSIQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +97.1% vs MAXN's -83.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs MAXN's -54.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs CSIQ's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.1% vs MAXN's -83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs MAXN's -190.0%, ROIC 17.6% vs -351.1% |
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • SOC leads 1 • MAXN leads 1 • CSIQ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 4402.1x SOC's $1M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $176M | $1M | $5.4B | $4.7B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$488M | -$454M | $2.2B | $3.4B | $284M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$565M | -$498M | $1.7B | $638M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$186M | -$611M | $1.7B | $934M | -$1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -137.2% | -8.7% | +41.7% | +43.9% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -367.6% | +33.0% | +31.1% | +0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -391.5% | +30.7% | +13.6% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.7% | -480.4% | +30.8% | +19.8% | -29.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.4% | — | +23.6% | -8.1% | -20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -5.4% | +65.1% | -33.9% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 79% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIVI offers better value at 0.15x vs FSLR's 0.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.84T | $23.1B | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $291M | $1.84T | $20.8B | $6.8B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -3.07x | 15.10x | 3.24x | -11.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x | 12.04x | 6.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.49x | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.38x | 1.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | — | 4.42x | 0.45x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2359.43x | 2.42x | 0.41x | 0.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.42x | 2.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSIQ's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -113.8% | +18.0% | +9.5% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -190.0% | -28.9% | +12.6% | +4.2% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | -44.6% | +17.6% | +10.8% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -189.7% | -37.5% | +15.9% | +12.1% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.05x | 0.68x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $283M | -$98M | -$2.3B | $4.4B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $98M | $2.8B | $76M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $311M | $0 | $499M | $4.5B | $7.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.64x | -2.28x | 53.51x | 2.80x | 0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for MAXN. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs MAXN's -83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs MAXN's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -84.0% | +9.5% | -21.8% | -1.5% | -30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.1% | -36.8% | +65.3% | +6.8% | +97.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +26.5% | +20.9% | -41.7% | -52.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +32.6% | +187.6% | +31.9% | -55.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +32.4% | +324.1% | -86.2% | +14.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.4% | +8.2% | +6.5% | -16.5% | -21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSLR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIVI is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs MAXN's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 1.51x | 1.39x | 1.10x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.97 | $35.00 | $285.99 | $37.45 | $34.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $3.72 | $125.80 | $25.38 | $8.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.6% | +36.7% | +75.0% | +73.1% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.4 | 45.8 | 64.3 | 54.8 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 5.4M | 2.1M | 22.4M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MAXN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOC as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). CIVI is the only dividend payer here at 18.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $264.13 | $31.00 | $28.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 73 | 16 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +18.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $4.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +18.3% | +5.9% |
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MAXN vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -54. 7% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus First Solar, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus MAXN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CSIQ is approximately 104% more volatile than CIVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 180% for Canadian Solar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -54. 7% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1276. 5% for Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus First Solar, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for First Solar, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MAXN, SOC, FSLR, CSIQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAXN or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 18. 2% yield). Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIVI: -86. 2%, MAXN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAXN and SOC and FSLR and CIVI and CSIQ?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI pays a dividend while MAXN, SOC, FSLR, CSIQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.