Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Biotechnology
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Banks - Diversified
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Biotechnology | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $6.22B | $3.02B | $2.39B | $23.95B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $960M | $959M | $669M | $4.07B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $91M | $-51M | $-609M | $327M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 44.2% | 11.3% | 83.6% | 45.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 12.5% | -3.8% | -83.9% | 14.8% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 47.1x | 63.0x | — | 30.4x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $303M | $186M | $1.28B | $4.69B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $766M | $98M | $434M | $675M | $343.34B |
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 457.2 | +357.2% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 316.1 | +216.1% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 314.0 | +214.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 120.0 | +20.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
ACMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 49.2% 10Y total return vs ICHR's 7.9%
ICHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +361.7% vs RARE's -38.0%
RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 3.7% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -89.4%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs ACMR's 1.33
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 30.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs ICHR's 3.97 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +361.7% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -89.4% |
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 2 • MAZE leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14016.6x MAZE's $20M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAZE's -6.1%. On growth, ACMR holds the edge at +34.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $960M | $959M | $669M | $4.1B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $139M | -$11M | -$536M | $945M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $91M | -$51M | -$609M | $327M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | -$108M | -$17M | -$487M | $401M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +44.2% | +11.3% | +83.6% | +45.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +12.5% | -3.8% | -83.9% | +14.8% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +9.5% | -5.3% | -91.0% | +8.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -11.3% | -1.7% | -72.8% | +9.8% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +34.2% | +4.7% | -2.4% | +15.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -20.0% | +46.2% | -17.2% | +53.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 80% valuation discount to MKSI's 81.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ACMR's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $6.2B | $3.0B | $2.4B | $23.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $5.8B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $28.0B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.89x | 68.58x | -56.36x | -4.18x | 81.39x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.09x | 62.96x | — | 30.40x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 45.79x | — | — | 30.76x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.90x | 3.18x | 3.56x | 6.09x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 3.28x | 4.48x | — | 8.86x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 48.18x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | +5.1% | -7.5% | -6.1% | +12.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | +3.4% | -5.2% | -45.8% | +3.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | +7.0% | -3.9% | -89.4% | +6.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | +6.6% | -4.7% | -46.4% | +7.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.16x | 0.28x | — | 1.73x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | -$463M | $87M | $842M | $4.0B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $766M | $98M | $434M | $675M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $303M | $186M | $1.3B | $4.7B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | 20.41x | -5.97x | -14.49x | 2.84x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $29,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,367 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +361.7% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 107.4% vs RARE's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | +109.3% | +325.3% | +3.2% | +111.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.5% | +265.1% | +361.7% | -38.0% | +280.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +792.2% | +141.6% | -52.6% | +252.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +192.4% | +55.5% | -76.3% | +99.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +4924.1% | +788.4% | -59.4% | +784.6% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +107.4% | +34.2% | -22.0% | +52.2% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKSI and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 3.46x | 3.97x | 1.43x | 2.55x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $99.45 | $88.15 | $42.37 | $359.35 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $23.03 | $13.12 | $18.29 | $88.49 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +94.5% | +98.5% | +57.5% | +99.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 64.2 | 65.4 | 53.2 | 63.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 642K | 1.5M | 990K | 1.5M | 1.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.0% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs -37.1% for ICHR (target: $55). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs ACMR's 0.12%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $87.50 | $54.60 | $48.36 | $306.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 14 | 33 | 29 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | +0.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACMR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MAZE vs ACMR vs ICHR vs RARE vs MKSI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MKS Inc. at 81. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 1. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +192. 4%, compared to -76. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +49. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 97β — meaning ICHR is approximately 321% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAZE leads at 92. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 1. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 0x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 48. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 163. 0% to $63. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), MKSI (0. 2% yield), ACMR (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MAZE, ICHR, RARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAZE or ACMR or ICHR or RARE or MKSI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ACMR: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAZE and ACMR and ICHR and RARE and MKSI and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAZE (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and RARE (Healthcare) and MKSI (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while MAZE, ACMR, ICHR, RARE, MKSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.