Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Construction
Construction
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.00B | $576M | $6.29B | $4.12B | $7.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.69B | $1.52B | $10.99B | $1.18B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $18M | $414M | $191M | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 28.1% | 15.3% | 24.3% | 39.2% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 1.9% | 4.9% | 22.1% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 16.1x | 11.2x | 24.0x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.35B | $510M | $2.76B | $229M | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $48M | $856M | $4M | $113M |
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| American Woodmark C… (AMWD) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 92.5 | -7.5% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 240.7 | +140.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AMWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 2.01 vs TREX's 7.16
- Lower P/E (16.1x vs 19.9x)
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 2.19x
Among these 5 stocks, TREX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 330.4% 10Y total return vs MBC's -21.8%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs AMWD's -7.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs AMWD's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs MBC's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs MBC's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.5% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs MBC's -0.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs 4.2% |
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 5 of 6 categories
AMWD leads 1 • MBC leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • TREX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 9.3x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBC's -0.1%. On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $1.5B | $11.0B | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $140M | $92M | $1.2B | $309M | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $18M | $414M | $191M | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $64M | $709M | $263M | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +15.3% | +24.3% | +39.2% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +1.9% | +4.9% | +22.1% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +1.2% | +3.8% | +16.3% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +4.2% | +6.5% | +22.3% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | -18.4% | +8.0% | +1.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -2.3% | +65.2% | +3.6% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMWD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, AMWD trades at a 84% valuation discount to MBC's 37.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMWD offers better value at 0.76x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $576M | $6.3B | $4.1B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $1.0B | $8.2B | $4.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.24x | 6.08x | 17.33x | 22.00x | 23.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.70x | 16.13x | 11.23x | 23.95x | 19.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x | — | 6.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.52x | 5.31x | 7.05x | 13.53x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.34x | 0.58x | 3.51x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 0.66x | 0.77x | 4.05x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.52x | 8.77x | 10.20x | 30.60x | 28.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-0 for MBC. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBC's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs AMWD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +1.9% | +5.0% | +18.8% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.2% | +3.0% | +12.3% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +7.8% | +3.9% | +16.4% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +10.1% | +4.8% | +23.2% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.56x | 0.33x | 0.22x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $462M | $1.9B | $225M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $48M | $856M | $4M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $510M | $2.8B | $229M | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 4.75x | 36.90x | — | 13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, AWI leads with a +11.5% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.7% | -28.1% | -6.2% | +9.3% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.5% | -30.3% | +1.9% | -30.8% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.8% | -22.1% | +2.9% | -30.4% | +151.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | -62.1% | -55.3% | -64.0% | +63.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | -47.1% | -47.6% | +239.9% | +330.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.3% | -8.0% | +0.9% | -11.4% | +36.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBC's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AWI currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs AMWD's 54.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.49x | 1.34x | 1.47x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.22 | $72.16 | $143.13 | $68.78 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.38 | $35.53 | $93.60 | $29.77 | $148.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.0% | +54.8% | +71.8% | +56.9% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.4 | 36.6 | 50.6 | 51.3 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 231K | 1.1M | 1.7M | 494K |
Analyst Outlook
AWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBC as "Buy", AMWD as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.6% upside for MBC (target: $16) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). AWI is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $47.00 | $130.00 | $44.50 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 32 | 31 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +4.8% | +2.4% | +1.3% | +1.8% |
AWI leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMWD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MBC vs AMWD vs MHK vs TREX vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
On trailing P/E, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus MasterBrand, Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Woodmark Corporation wins at 2. 01x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus MasterBrand, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MBC is approximately 100% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 100% for MasterBrand, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -78. 1% for MasterBrand, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 1. 0% for MasterBrand, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 4. 7% for MHK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 01x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBC: 104. 6% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI?
In this comparison, AWI (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MBC, AMWD, MHK, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MBC or AMWD or MHK or TREX or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, MBC: -21. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBC and AMWD and MHK and TREX and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (MBC (Consumer Cyclical) and AMWD (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and TREX (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AWI pays a dividend while MBC, AMWD, MHK, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.