Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs FHN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs FHN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $11.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $4.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $982M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 67.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $4.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $961M |
MBIN vs FHN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs FHN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 2.8%
- 338.3% 10Y total return vs FHN's 119.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 3.17x
FHN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 38.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs MBIN's 2.7%
- 1.0% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FHN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs FHN's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FHN's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs FHN's +34.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FHN's 0.4% |
MBIN vs FHN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MBIN vs FHN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 3.7x MBIN's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.7% (FHN) to 16.0% (MBIN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $982M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $628M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +67.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +79.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, MBIN trades at a 5% valuation discount to FHN's 13.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FHN's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBIN's 22.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $15.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 13.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.99x | 11.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.36x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for MBIN. FHN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHN scores 7/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $961M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBIN five years ago would be worth $16,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,355 for FHN. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +57.0% total return vs FHN's +34.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 34.9% vs MBIN's 27.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +34.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +145.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +338.3% | +119.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FHN's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $26.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $18.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MBIN as "Buy" and FHN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for MBIN (target: $55) vs 14.4% for FHN (target: $28). For income investors, MBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.76% vs FHN's 2.59%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.7% |
MBIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FHN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
MBIN vs FHN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or FHN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the stronger pick with 1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or FHN?
On trailing P/E, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus First Horizon Corporation at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or FHN?
Over the past 5 years, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) delivered a total return of +62.
7%, compared to +43. 6% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +338. 3% versus FHN's +119. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or FHN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus First Horizon Corporation's 1. 10β — meaning FHN is approximately 1% more volatile than MBIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or FHN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is pulling ahead at 1.
0% versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or FHN?
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 16. 0% for Merchants Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHN leads at 25. 7% versus 19. 3% for MBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or FHN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9.
0x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for First Horizon Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBIN: 16. 5% to $54. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or FHN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 6% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN).
09Is MBIN or FHN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 2. 8% yield, +338. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MBIN: +338. 3%, FHN: +119. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and FHN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.