Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MBLY vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
MBLY vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $7.39B | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4.11B | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -209.5% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 32.1x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.84B | $10.61B |
MBLY vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1538.3 | +1438.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBLY vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, MBLY is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs MBLY's -68.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs MBLY's 14.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 32.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs MBLY's -204.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs MBLY's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs MBLY's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs MBLY's -35.5%, ROIC 81.8% vs -3.2% |
MBLY vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MBLY vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 107.2x MBLY's $2.0B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBLY's -2.0%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.8B | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.1B | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.4% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MBLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NVDA's 37.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 72.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.90x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.08x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 72.09x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.90x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.12x | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MBLY. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBLY scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.3% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.5% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.2% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.8B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,131 for MBLY. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs MBLY's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs MBLY's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.2% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.7% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.7% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.7% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBLY's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs MBLY's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.18 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.47 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.9% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NVDA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MBLY as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.2% upside for MBLY (target: $14) vs 34.3% for NVDA (target: $279).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.44 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MBLY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MBLY vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBLY or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 42. 4x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBLY or NVDA?
On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBLY or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to -68.
7% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus MBLY's -68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBLY or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Mobileye Global Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning MBLY is approximately 5% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MBLY or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 14. 5% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBLY or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -20. 7% for Mobileye Global Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -23. 2% for MBLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBLY or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
1x forward P/E versus 32. 1x for Mobileye Global Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBLY: 59. 2% to $14. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBLY or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MBLY or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+234.
3% 10Y return). Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +234. 3%, MBLY: -68. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBLY and NVDA?
These companies operate in different sectors (MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and NVDA (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.