Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.+126.6%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.+187.6%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.14B
5Y Perf.-66.4%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$690M
5Y Perf.+142.5%

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MBWM logoMBWM
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$898M$204M$24.14B$690M
Revenue (TTM)$372M$90M$10.89B$315M
Net Income (TTM)$89M$14M$382M$69M
Gross Margin64.0%54.7%38.1%69.6%
Operating Margin27.5%7.0%17.5%25.8%
Forward P/E9.5x11.8x7.4x9.4x
Total Debt$826M$52M$4.01B$117M
Cash & Equiv.$473M$119M$599M$52M

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MBWM
CZWI
FIS
IBCP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM)100226.6+126.6%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100287.6+187.6%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10033.6-66.4%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100242.5+142.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mercantile Bank Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CZWI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
  • 178.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 181.9%
  • 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • 1.4% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.5% vs 2.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46 vs MBWM's 0.87, lower leverage
  • +42.6% vs FIS's -38.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.30 vs CZWI's 2.33
  • 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.63
  • 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.1%
  • NIM 3.3% vs CZWI's 2.9%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFIS logoFIS5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.63
Quality / MarginsMBWM logoMBWM23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.46 vs MBWM's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.1%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+42.6% vs FIS's -38.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MBWM logoMBWM1.4% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.5% vs 2.0%

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MBWMMercantile Bank Corporation
FY 2025
Credit and Debit Card
42.4%$9M
Service Charges on Deposit and Sweep Accounts
37.5%$8M
Payroll Processing
16.0%$3M
Customer Service
4.0%$876,000
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCZWILAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$372M$90M$10.9B$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$107M$9M$3.8B$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$89M$14M$382M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$11M$11M$2.8B$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.0%+54.7%+38.1%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.5%+7.0%+17.5%+25.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.9%+16.0%+3.5%+21.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.0%+11.5%+26.1%+22.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.8%+63.0%+92.3%+2.3%
Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 62.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$898M$204M$24.1B$690M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$136M$27.6B$755M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.52x14.48x62.15x10.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.53x11.81x7.43x9.44x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.63x2.85x2.55x1.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.74x15.34x7.56x9.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.42x2.26x2.26x2.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.17x1.09x1.74x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF80.12x19.61x9.84x9.83x
Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.5%+7.8%+2.7%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+0.8%+1.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%+2.0%+6.0%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.0%+0.6%+6.6%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94668
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.14x0.28x0.29x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$353M-$67M$3.4B$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$473M$119M$599M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$826M$52M$4.0B$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.79x0.16x4.64x0.91x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $18,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,723 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +42.6% total return vs FIS's -38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.8% vs FIS's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.0%+21.9%-28.3%+5.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.7%+42.6%-38.4%+11.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+120.9%+150.3%-7.4%+123.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.2%+71.4%-62.8%+63.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+178.3%+156.3%-12.4%+181.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.2%+35.8%-2.5%+30.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBWM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.46x0.76x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$55.77$22.62$82.74$37.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$42.17$12.83$43.30$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.2%+93.5%+56.3%+89.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.262.250.443.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded112K42K5.4M177K
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 9.6% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs CZWI's 1.75%.

MetricMBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.00$67.38$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts72377
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+1.8%+3.5%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises67111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.47$0.37$1.63$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.1%0.0%+1.8%
Evenly matched — FIS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CZWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). IBCP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallCitizens Community Bancorp,… (CZWI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 62. 1x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 30x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +80.

2%, compared to -62. 8% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +181. 9% versus FIS's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Mercantile Bank Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning MBWM is approximately 90% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 44. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 3%, FIS: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MBWM and CZWI and FIS and IBCP?

These companies operate in different sectors (MBWM (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and IBCP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MBWM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MBWM and CZWI and FIS and IBCP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MBWM: 2.7% · CZWI: -9.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(MBWM: 23.9% · CZWI: 16.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MBWM: 9.5x · CZWI: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.