Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $898M | $204M | $24.14B | $690M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $372M | $90M | $10.89B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $89M | $14M | $382M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 54.7% | 38.1% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 7.0% | 17.5% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 11.8x | 7.4x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $826M | $52M | $4.01B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $473M | $119M | $599M | $52M |
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 287.6 | +187.6% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
- 178.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 181.9%
- 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.4% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.5% vs 2.0%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs MBWM's 0.87, lower leverage
- +42.6% vs FIS's -38.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.30 vs CZWI's 2.33
- 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.63
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.1%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.1%
- NIM 3.3% vs CZWI's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs MBWM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.6% vs FIS's -38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.5% vs 2.0% |
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CZWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • MBWM leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $372M | $90M | $10.9B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $107M | $9M | $3.8B | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $89M | $14M | $382M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $11M | $2.8B | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.0% | +54.7% | +38.1% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +7.0% | +17.5% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +16.0% | +3.5% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +11.5% | +26.1% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +8.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +63.0% | +92.3% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 62.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $898M | $204M | $24.1B | $690M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $136M | $27.6B | $755M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.52x | 14.48x | 62.15x | 10.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 11.81x | 7.43x | 9.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.63x | 2.85x | 2.55x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.74x | 15.34x | 7.56x | 9.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 2.26x | 2.26x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.09x | 1.74x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.12x | 19.61x | 9.84x | 9.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | +7.8% | +2.7% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +2.0% | +6.0% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +0.6% | +6.6% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 0.28x | 0.29x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $353M | -$67M | $3.4B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $473M | $119M | $599M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $826M | $52M | $4.0B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.79x | 0.16x | 4.64x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $18,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,723 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +42.6% total return vs FIS's -38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.8% vs FIS's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.0% | +21.9% | -28.3% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.7% | +42.6% | -38.4% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.9% | +150.3% | -7.4% | +123.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.2% | +71.4% | -62.8% | +63.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.3% | +156.3% | -12.4% | +181.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.2% | +35.8% | -2.5% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBWM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.46x | 0.76x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.77 | $22.62 | $82.74 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.17 | $12.83 | $43.30 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +93.5% | +56.3% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 62.2 | 50.4 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 112K | 42K | 5.4M | 177K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 9.6% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs CZWI's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | — | $67.38 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 | 37 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.8% | +3.5% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.47 | $0.37 | $1.63 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
CZWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). IBCP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MBWM vs CZWI vs FIS vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 62. 1x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 30x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +80.
2%, compared to -62. 8% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +181. 9% versus FIS's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Mercantile Bank Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning MBWM is approximately 90% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 44. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MBWM or CZWI or FIS or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 3%, FIS: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBWM and CZWI and FIS and IBCP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MBWM (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and IBCP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.