MC vs EVR

For growth investors, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 0% for Moelis & Company (MC). Moelis & Company (MC) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evercore Inc. (EVR) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Moelis & Company (MC) is the cheapest at 21.

7x versus Evercore Inc. at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, Evercore Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) delivered a total return of +136. 2%, compared to +50. 2% for Moelis & Company (MC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVR returned +613. 3% versus MC's +262. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Moelis & Company (MC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

75β versus Evercore Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning EVR is approximately 9% more volatile than MC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Moelis & Company (MC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 50% for Evercore Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus 27. 0% for Moelis & Company (MC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moelis & Company grew EPS 65. 2% year-over-year, compared to 54. 7% for Evercore Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Moelis & Company (MC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 15. 3% for Evercore Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVR leads at 20. 5% versus 18. 1% for MC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVR leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Moelis & Company — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVR: 15. 6% to $382. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Moelis & Company (MC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Evercore Inc. (EVR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Evercore Inc.

(EVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +613. 3% 10Y return). Moelis & Company (MC) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVR: +613. 3%, MC: +262. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.