Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MC vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MC
Moelis & Company

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.+89.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$849.03B
5Y Perf.+223.6%

MC vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MC logoMC
JPM logoJPM
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$4.68B$849.03B
Revenue (TTM)$1.52B$270.79B
Net Income (TTM)$233M$58.03B
Gross Margin99.2%58.6%
Operating Margin18.1%27.7%
Forward P/E20.8x14.2x
Total Debt$267M$751.15B
Cash & Equiv.$509M$469.32B

MC vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MC
JPM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Moelis & Company (MC)100189.7+89.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100323.6+223.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MC vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Moelis & Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MC
Moelis & Company
The Banking Pick

MC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 65.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 39.3%, current ratio 21.47x
  • Beta 1.75, yield 4.1%, current ratio 21.47x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 1.6%
  • 471.7% 10Y total return vs MC's 261.3%
  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 20.8x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMC logoMC27.0% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 14.6%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.2x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MC's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 1.00 vs MC's 1.75
DividendsMC logoMC4.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+28.7% vs MC's +25.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MC's 0.8%

MC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MCMoelis & Company

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2024
Consumer & Community Banking
40.3%$71.5B
Commercial And Investment Bank
39.5%$70.1B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
12.2%$21.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
9.8%$17.4B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,037,000,000

MC vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGMC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 178.5x MC's $1.5B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MC's 15.4%.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.5B$270.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$286M$81.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$233M$58.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$540M-$119.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.2%+58.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.1%+27.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.4%+21.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.6%-15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.3%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 27% valuation discount to MC's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MC's 15.5x.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$849.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$1.13T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.70x15.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.79x14.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.55x13.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.09x3.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.43x2.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MC leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

MC delivers a 37.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. MC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MC scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+37.9%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.9%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.9%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.0%+8.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x2.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$241M$281.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$509M$469.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$267M$751.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.74x
MC leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,435 for MC. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +28.7% total return vs MC's +25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 34.0% vs MC's 26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.5%-2.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+25.4%+28.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.7%+140.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.3%+110.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+261.3%+471.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+34.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MC's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs MC's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.75x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$78.22$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$51.06$248.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.6%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.153.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M8.4M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MC as "Hold" and JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for MC (target: $73) vs 7.6% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, MC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs JPM's 1.63%.

MetricMC logoMCMoelis & CompanyJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.40$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts2261
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises114
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.63$5.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%+3.4%
Evenly matched — MC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MC vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MC or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Moelis & Company (MC) is the stronger pick with 27.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 6% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MC or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Moelis & Company at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MC or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to +44. 3% for Moelis & Company (MC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +471. 7% versus MC's +261. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MC or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Moelis & Company's 1. 75β — meaning MC is approximately 74% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Moelis & Company (MC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MC or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moelis & Company (MC) is pulling ahead at 27.

0% versus 14. 6% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moelis & Company grew EPS 65. 2% year-over-year, compared to 21. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MC or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 15. 4% for Moelis & Company — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 18. 1% for MC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MC leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MC or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Moelis & Company — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MC: 15. 1% to $73. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MC or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Moelis & Company (MC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 6% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is MC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 6% yield, +471. 7% 10Y return). Moelis & Company (MC) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +471. 7%, MC: +261. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MC and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JPM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MC and JPM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MC: 27.0% · JPM: 14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(MC: 15.4% · JPM: 21.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MC: 21.7x · JPM: 15.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.