Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $54.97B | $9.78B | $259.70B | $1.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $4.04B | $18.44B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-97M | $361M | $5.37B | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 41.1% | 57.3% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 9.4% | 35.3% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | 64.8x | 13.8x | 37.8x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.67B | $1.20B | $15.39B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $772M | $1.16B | $3.23B | $16.18B |
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1416.3 | +1316.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +115.1% vs SWKS's +1.5%
SWKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 36.5x)
- 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%
TXN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11 vs AVGO's 1.96
AVGO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs TXN's 471.6%
- 23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 36.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs AVGO's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.1% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 2 • MCHP leads 0 • TXN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 16.9x SWKS's $4.0B. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $4.0B | $18.4B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $881M | $842M | $8.1B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$97M | $361M | $5.4B | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $820M | $697M | $3.7B | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +41.1% | +57.3% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +9.4% | +35.3% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +8.9% | +29.1% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +17.2% | +20.2% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | -1.0% | +18.6% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +164.2% | -44.2% | +32.0% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVGO's 58.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55.0B | $9.8B | $259.7B | $1.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $59.9B | $9.8B | $271.9B | $2.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9999.00x | 21.12x | 52.34x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.79x | 13.79x | 37.76x | 36.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.21x | 10.20x | 33.89x | 58.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.49x | 2.39x | 14.69x | 30.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.71x | 1.75x | 16.00x | 24.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 71.19x | 8.85x | 99.77x | 72.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.4% | +6.3% | +32.5% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +4.6% | +15.5% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +6.3% | +15.8% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +7.0% | +19.0% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.21x | 0.95x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.9B | $42M | $12.2B | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $772M | $1.2B | $3.2B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $1.2B | $15.4B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.78x | 14.46x | 12.06x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MCHP leads with a +115.1% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.9% | +2.1% | +62.3% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.1% | +1.5% | +76.5% | +102.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.9% | -30.3% | +83.5% | +566.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | -55.5% | +65.5% | +833.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.8% | +31.2% | +471.6% | +2897.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.9% | -11.4% | +22.4% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCHP and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVGO's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.36x | 1.11x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.17 | $90.90 | $292.64 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.92 | $51.92 | $152.73 | $198.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +71.6% | +97.5% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.5 | 55.9 | 79.6 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.0M | 3.3M | 6.7M | 23.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -14.4% for MCHP (target: $87). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs AVGO's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.00 | $62.75 | $253.71 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 59 | 65 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +4.3% | +1.9% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 22 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | $2.79 | $5.48 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.5% | +0.6% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MCHP vs SWKS vs TXN vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus SWKS's +31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus Broadcom Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AVGO is approximately 77% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus 6. 7% for MCHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO).
09Is MCHP or SWKS or TXN or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCHP and SWKS and TXN and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.