MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
Food Confectioners
Market Cap$78.76B
5Y Perf.+17.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MDLZ vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+216.3%
MDLZ vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MDLZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Confectioners | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $78.76B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.30B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.61B | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $22.40B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.13B | $10.73B |
MDLZ vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MDLZ
WMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDLZ vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MDLZ leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Walmart Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
The Income Pick
MDLZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -44.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 86.5%, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs MDLZ's 69.9%
- +32.6% vs MDLZ's -6.6%
- 7.9% ROA vs MDLZ's 3.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 6.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MDLZ | 5.8% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% |
| Value | MDLZ | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | MDLZ | 6.6% margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MDLZ | Beta 0.06 vs WMT's 0.12 |
| Dividends | MDLZ | 3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +32.6% vs MDLZ's -6.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs MDLZ's 3.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 6.0% |
MDLZ vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MDLZ vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMDLZLAGGINGWMT
WMTWalmart Inc.
2leads
MDLZMondelez Internationa…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MDLZ6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MDLZ5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 17.9x MDLZ's $39.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (MDLZ) to 3.3% (WMT).
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.3B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.7% | +35.1% |
MDLZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.5x trailing earnings, MDLZ trades at a 32% valuation discount to WMT's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDLZ's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 25.0x.
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78.8B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99.0B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.47x | 47.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.07x | 44.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.90x | 24.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.04x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.08x | 10.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.35x | 25.08x |
MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $10 for MDLZ. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDLZ's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs MDLZ's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20.3B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.4B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.01x | 11.85x |
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,399 for MDLZ. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.6% total return vs MDLZ's -6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 38.1% vs MDLZ's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.6% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.8% | +163.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.0% | +187.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.9% | +517.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.8% | +38.1% |
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDLZ and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDLZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs MDLZ's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.15 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.20 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 17.5M |
Evenly matched — MDLZ and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MDLZ and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MDLZ as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for MDLZ (target: $67) vs 4.8% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, MDLZ offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | MDLZMondelez Internat… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.92 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — MDLZ and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MDLZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallMondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MDLZ vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDLZ or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) offers the better valuation at 32. 5x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDLZ or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the cheapest at 32. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, Mondelez International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDLZ or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +187. 7%, compared to +14. 0% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +517. 6% versus MDLZ's +69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDLZ or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 99% more volatile than MDLZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDLZ or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDLZ or WMT?
Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDLZ leads at 9. 4% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDLZ leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDLZ or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDLZ: 9. 2% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDLZ or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is MDLZ or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +517. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +517. 6%, MDLZ: +69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDLZ and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MDLZ: 8.2% · WMT: 5.8%)Net Margin>
%
(MDLZ: 6.6% · WMT: 3.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MDLZ: 32.5x · WMT: 47.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.