REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $12M | $1M | $616M | $354M | $281M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $10M | $166M | $76M | $65M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-10M | $21M | $-10M | $-415K |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.1% | -11.7% | 87.4% | -4.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | -66.7% | 27.9% | 78.6% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 83.0x | — | 59.3x |
| Total Debt | $785K | $70M | $856M | $0.00 | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $613K | $11M | $27M | $5M |
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medalist Diversifie… (MDRR) | 100 | 59.6 | -40.4% |
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDRR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- 100.0% yield, vs LAND's 6.7%
GOOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 51.0% 10Y total return vs PINE's 38.3%
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- 12.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
- 1.7% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.4% vs -4.0%
LAND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 6.7%
PINE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 0.33x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.33 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage
- +37.3% vs GIPR's -83.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs LAND's 6.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.4% vs -4.0% |
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories
PINE leads 1 • MDRR leads 0 • GOOD leads 0 • LAND leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOOD and LAND each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 16.7x GIPR's $10M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $10M | $166M | $76M | $65M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$1M | $106M | $94M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$10M | $21M | -$10M | -$415,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12,992 | $654,400 | $90M | $5M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +74.1% | -11.7% | +87.4% | -4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -66.7% | +27.9% | +78.6% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.0% | -103.2% | +12.7% | -13.8% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +6.6% | +54.1% | +6.2% | -71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +2.9% | +11.8% | +38.6% | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.0% | +5.5% | +2.8% | +66.7% | +185.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MDRR's 2.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINE's 14.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $1M | $616M | $354M | $281M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $71M | $1.5B | $327M | $671M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.87x | -0.17x | 31.02x | -33.62x | -89.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 82.97x | — | 59.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.70x | — | 12.36x | 3.46x | 14.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.15x | 3.82x | 4.65x | 4.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.04x | 1.76x | 0.53x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 160.75x | 1.39x | 9.17x | 50.62x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GOOD and LAND each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. MDRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDRR scores 4/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -32.2% | +9.7% | -1.6% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -9.5% | +1.7% | -0.8% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | -4.0% | +4.4% | +4.9% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | -5.0% | +5.3% | +4.7% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 2.14x | 2.50x | — | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $70M | $846M | -$27M | $390M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $612,939 | $11M | $27M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $784,987 | $70M | $856M | $0 | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | -1.20x | 1.46x | 2.99x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -60.4% | +21.6% | +8.8% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | -83.8% | +0.7% | +11.2% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | -81.0% | +43.8% | -27.5% | +46.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | -76.7% | -9.7% | -43.8% | +41.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | -56.3% | +51.0% | +42.9% | +38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | -42.5% | +12.9% | -10.2% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDRR and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDRR is the less volatile stock with a -0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.35x | 1.73x | 0.55x | 0.68x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.52 | $1.99 | $15.03 | $13.00 | $20.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.55 | $0.23 | $10.33 | $8.47 | $13.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +13.1% | +84.6% | +75.0% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 42.9 | 49.1 | 41.0 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 1.1M | 390K | 543K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and LAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOD as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for PINE (target: $21) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $13.00 | $10.00 | $20.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 14 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +100.0% | +11.4% | +6.7% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $0.26 | $1.44 | $0.66 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
MDRR vs GIPR vs GOOD vs LAND vs PINE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (83. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
On forward P/E, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 59. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +51. 0% versus MDRR's -80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.
(MDRR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 35β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately -596% more volatile than MDRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc. (MDRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) trades at 59. 3x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 23. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PINE: 5. 7% to $20. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is MDRR or GIPR or GOOD or LAND or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.
(MDRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 35), 4. 3% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDRR: -80. 2%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDRR and GIPR and GOOD and LAND and PINE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDRR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock. MDRR, GIPR, GOOD, LAND pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.