Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MDWD
MediWound Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$213M
5Y Perf.+15.5%
KROS
Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$449M
5Y Perf.-58.0%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.32B
5Y Perf.+26.5%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.18B
5Y Perf.+125.4%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$304M
5Y Perf.-88.5%

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MDWD logoMDWD
KROS logoKROS
BEAM logoBEAM
ARWR logoARWR
EDIT logoEDIT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$213M$449M$3.32B$10.18B$304M
Revenue (TTM)$17M$244M$132M$622M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$87M$-65M$-301M$-160M
Gross Margin19.2%99.5%-64.2%88.1%
Operating Margin-149.1%28.9%-281.0%-35.7%
Forward P/E5.2x
Total Debt$9M$17M$294M$366M$18M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$287M$295M$227M$147M

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDITLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MDWD
KROS
BEAM
ARWR
EDIT
StockMay 20May 26Return
MediWound Ltd. (MDWD)100115.5+15.5%
Keros Therapeutics,… (KROS)10042.0-58.0%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)100126.5+26.5%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100225.4+125.4%
Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT)10011.5-88.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KROS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MDWD
MediWound Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

MDWD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KROS
Keros Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KROS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.00
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 15.45x
  • Beta 1.00, current ratio 15.45x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Angle

BEAM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 11.6% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 72.4%
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
  • +448.5% vs KROS's -13.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
ValueKROS logoKROSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKROS logoKROS35.7% margin vs MDWD's -140.8%
Stability / SafetyKROS logoKROSBeta 1.00 vs EDIT's 2.45, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+448.5% vs KROS's -13.9%
Efficiency (ROA)KROS logoKROS13.3% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MDWDMediWound Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

KROSKeros Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
License
84.1%$205M
Service, Other
15.9%$39M
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EDITEditas Medicine, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$41M

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKROSLAGGINGEDIT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARWR and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $622M and $0 in trailing revenue. KROS is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDWD's -140.8%. On growth, MDWD holds the edge at -68.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$244M$132M$622M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$23M$72M-$355M-$203M$0
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M$87M-$65M-$301M-$160M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$21M$106M-$384M-$51M-$166M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.2%+99.5%-64.2%+88.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-149.1%+28.9%-2.8%-35.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-140.8%+35.7%-49.2%-48.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-122.7%+43.4%-2.9%-8.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-68.0%-87.3%-100.0%-86.4%-151.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-55.6%+66.7%+26.6%-133.8%+105.5%
KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KROS's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 84.4x.

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Market CapShares × price$213M$449M$3.3B$10.2B$304M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$217M$179M$3.3B$10.3B$176M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.89x5.25x-39.90x-5957.38x-1.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.48x84.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.54x1.84x23.76x12.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.32x1.51x2.58x19.31x10.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.24x64.87x
KROS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KROS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KROS delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. KROS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARWR's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-65.8%+14.3%-5.9%-55.5%-5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-30.2%+13.3%-4.6%-18.1%-74.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-49.5%+167.9%-31.1%+9.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-47.0%+15.6%-33.3%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945461
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.06x0.24x0.73x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$271M-$1M$140M-$129M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$287M$295M$227M$147M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$17M$294M$366M$18M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.05x1.08x-1.03x
KROS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $10,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $994 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +448.5% total return vs KROS's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 21.6% vs KROS's -34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.0%-34.9%+19.1%+7.2%+51.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.1%-13.9%+87.4%+448.5%+123.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.3%-72.0%-3.1%+79.7%-67.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.4%-75.6%-49.6%+10.0%-90.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.7%-39.9%+72.4%+1161.8%-89.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.1%-34.6%-1.0%+21.6%-31.4%
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KROS and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KROS is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs KROS's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x1.00x2.08x1.74x2.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.51$22.55$36.44$79.48$4.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.90$10.41$15.35$12.44$1.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.6%+53.5%+88.7%+91.4%+68.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.849.457.766.352.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded83K411K2.0M1.9M1.6M
Evenly matched — KROS and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MDWD as "Buy", KROS as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 750.0% upside for KROS (target: $103) vs 13.3% for ARWR (target: $82).

MetricMDWD logoMDWDMediWound Ltd.KROS logoKROSKeros Therapeutic…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$102.60$40.83$82.33$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1316272025
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+83.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KROS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallKeros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MDWD vs KROS vs BEAM vs ARWR vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MediWound Ltd. (MDWD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT?

Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) delivered a total return of +10. 0%, compared to -90. 1% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1162% versus EDIT's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

(KROS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning EDIT is approximately 145% more volatile than KROS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 73% for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Keros Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 146. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 7% for MediWound Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT?

Keros Therapeutics, Inc.

(KROS) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 7% net margin versus -140. 8% for MediWound Ltd. — meaning it keeps 35. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KROS leads at 28. 9% versus -274. 6% for BEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is MDWD or KROS or BEAM or ARWR or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1162% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1162%, EDIT: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between MDWD and KROS and BEAM and ARWR and EDIT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MDWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KROS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MDWD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KROS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BEAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EDIT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MDWD and KROS and BEAM and ARWR and EDIT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MDWD: -68.0% · KROS: -87.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.