MEI vs APH vs CTS vs HUBB

For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). CTS Corporation (CTS) offers the better valuation at 27. 3x trailing P/E (24. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amphenol Corporation (APH) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the cheapest at 27.

3x versus Amphenol Corporation at 40. 9x. On forward P/E, CTS Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amphenol Corporation wins at 1. 05x versus CTS Corporation's 1. 58x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +308.

8%, compared to -75. 3% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +899. 3% versus MEI's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

38β versus Methode Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning MEI is approximately 56% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CTS Corporation (CTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.

7% versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amphenol Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for Hubbell Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTS leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CTS Corporation's 1. 58x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, CTS Corporation (CTS) trades at 24. 6x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for Amphenol Corporation — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APH: 32. 0% to $180. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 3% for CTS Corporation (CTS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, MEI: -52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MEI (Technology) and APH (Technology) and CTS (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MEI, HUBB pay a dividend while APH, CTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.