Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $94.80B | $15.06B | $2.92T | $53.62B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28.89B | $3.55B | $742.78B | $21.04B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.00B | $379M | $90.80B | $1.43B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 43.5% | 50.6% | 44.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 5.7% | 11.5% | 8.2% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 39.2x | 34.6x | 34.8x | 25.1x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $11.39B | $2.05B | $152.99B | $4.12B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.67B | $3.43B | $86.81B | $2.41B | $30.71B |
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 454.2 | +354.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MELI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 39.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
- Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51
GRAB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x)
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs MELI's 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 0.99 vs AMZN's 1.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs SE's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs SE's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs 3.3% |
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
MELI leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • SE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 209.1x GRAB's $3.6B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SE's 6.8%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28.9B | $3.6B | $742.8B | $21.0B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $395M | $155.9B | $2.0B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.0B | $379M | $90.8B | $1.4B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.1B | -$88M | -$2.5B | $3.9B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +43.5% | +50.6% | +44.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +8.2% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +10.7% | +12.2% | +6.8% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | -2.5% | -0.3% | +18.5% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.6% | +23.5% | +16.6% | +38.3% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +2.1% | +74.8% | +126.9% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SE and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 70% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94.8B | $15.1B | $2.92T | $53.6B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102.5B | $13.7B | $2.98T | $55.3B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.47x | 59.50x | 37.82x | 121.47x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.21x | 34.64x | 34.77x | 25.06x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.18x | 36.09x | 20.47x | 52.61x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 4.47x | 4.07x | 3.19x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.05x | 2.36x | 7.14x | 6.32x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.80x | 112.36x | 378.98x | 18.14x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $6 for GRAB. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.7% | +5.8% | +23.3% | +15.2% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.3% | +11.5% | +5.8% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.8% | +3.3% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.3% | +2.9% | +15.3% | +6.0% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.30x | 0.37x | 0.49x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.7B | -$1.4B | $66.2B | $1.7B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $3.4B | $86.8B | $2.4B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.4B | $2.1B | $153.0B | $4.1B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.53x | 2.96x | 39.96x | 49.70x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,248 for GRAB. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs SE's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.3% | -25.4% | +19.7% | -32.6% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.3% | -21.7% | +43.7% | -37.8% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +13.5% | +156.2% | +5.1% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -67.5% | +64.8% | -63.1% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1370.4% | -68.1% | +697.8% | +455.5% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +4.3% | +36.8% | +1.7% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MELI and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SE's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.42x | 1.51x | 1.45x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2645.22 | $6.62 | $278.56 | $199.30 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1593.21 | $3.48 | $185.01 | $77.05 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.7% | +57.3% | +97.3% | +44.5% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 46.6 | 81.1 | 57.1 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 472K | 48.1M | 45.5M | 4.8M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MELI as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2420.00 | $6.70 | $306.77 | $147.67 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 12 | 94 | 44 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs SE vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger pick with 39. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, Sea Limited is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -67. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus GRAB's -68. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 26% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is pulling ahead at 39. 1% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sea Limited (SE) trades at 25. 1x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MELI, GRAB, AMZN, SE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MELI or GRAB or AMZN or SE or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, GRAB: -68. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MELI and GRAB and AMZN and SE and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and GRAB (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SE (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.