Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MENS vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MENS vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $160M | $1.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3K | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -105.0% |
| Total Debt | $18M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98K | $164M |
MENS vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jyong Biotech Ltd. … (MENS) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 258.5 | +158.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MENS vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MENS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- -16.1% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
- -0.0% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%
NUVB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.04
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- -49.6% 10Y total return vs MENS's -78.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | -16.1% margin vs NUVB's -102.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs MENS's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +141.1% vs MENS's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8% |
MENS vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MENS vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB and MENS operate at a comparable scale, with $143M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1,936 | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3,019 | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3,624 | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.6% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MENS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $160M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.16x | -8.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 27.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUVB scores 4/9 vs MENS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98,000 | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.00x | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVB five years ago would be worth $4,574 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,127 for MENS. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +141.1% total return vs MENS's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 46.0% vs MENS's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.0% | -41.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.7% | +141.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +211.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | -54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | -49.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.3% | +46.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NUVB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVB is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MENS's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVB currently trades 51.7% from its 52-week high vs MENS's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.00 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 157K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MENS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MENS vs NUVB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MENS or NUVB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MENS or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) delivered a total return of -54. 3%, compared to -78. 7% for Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares (MENS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVB returned -49. 6% versus MENS's -78. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MENS or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares's 2. 49β — meaning MENS is approximately 22% more volatile than NUVB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MENS or NUVB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc.
grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to 31. 4% for Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MENS or NUVB?
Jyong Biotech Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (MENS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MENS leads at 0. 0% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MENS or NUVB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MENS or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Jyong Biotech Ltd. Ordinary Shares (MENS) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVB: -49. 6%, MENS: -78. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MENS and NUVB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MENS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.