Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MEOH
Methanex Corporation

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$4.75B
5Y Perf.+281.0%
OLN
Olin Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
CE
Celanese Corporation

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.54B
5Y Perf.-35.1%
WLK
Westlake Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.47B
5Y Perf.+104.2%
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+8.2%

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MEOH logoMEOH
OLN logoOLN
CE logoCE
WLK logoWLK
EMN logoEMN
IndustryChemicalsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$4.75B$3.05B$6.54B$12.47B$8.43B
Revenue (TTM)$3.59B$6.72B$9.49B$10.98B$8.64B
Net Income (TTM)$80M$-127M$-1.02B$-1.64B$399M
Gross Margin25.3%5.3%20.1%1.5%19.8%
Operating Margin12.9%-1.6%-7.4%-15.5%9.4%
Forward P/E8.2x10.4x26.1x12.5x
Total Debt$3.50B$3.39B$12.93B$6.44B$5.08B
Cash & Equiv.$428M$168M$1.26B$2.72B$566M

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MEOH
OLN
CE
WLK
EMN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Methanex Corporation (MEOH)100381.0+281.0%
Olin Corporation (OLN)100222.4+122.4%
Celanese Corporation (CE)10064.9-35.1%
Westlake Corporation (WLK)100204.2+104.2%
Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN)100108.2+8.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEOH and EMN are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Eastman Chemical Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. OLN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MEOH
Methanex Corporation
The Growth Play

MEOH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -3.5%, EPS growth -60.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.9%
  • Lower P/E (8.2x vs 12.5x)
  • Beta 0.39 vs OLN's 1.47, lower leverage
  • +91.9% vs EMN's +2.3%
Best for: growth exposure
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Growth Leader

OLN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 3.7% revenue growth vs WLK's -8.0%
Best for: growth
CE
Celanese Corporation
The Value Angle

CE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
WLK
Westlake Corporation
The Income Pick

WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.2%
  • 142.4% 10Y total return vs MEOH's 135.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 1.06, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.24x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
The Quality Compounder

EMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 4.6% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
  • 4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2%
  • 2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 6.7% vs -9.0%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOLN logoOLN3.7% revenue growth vs WLK's -8.0%
ValueMEOH logoMEOHLower P/E (8.2x vs 12.5x)
Quality / MarginsEMN logoEMN4.6% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
Stability / SafetyMEOH logoMEOHBeta 0.39 vs OLN's 1.47, lower leverage
DividendsEMN logoEMN4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2%
Momentum (1Y)MEOH logoMEOH+91.9% vs EMN's +2.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EMN logoEMN2.6% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 6.7% vs -9.0%

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MEOHMethanex Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

OLNOlin Corporation
FY 2025
Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls Segment
54.3%$3.7B
Winchester Segment
25.4%$1.7B
Epoxy Segment
20.2%$1.4B
CECelanese Corporation
FY 2025
Engineered Materials
56.0%$5.4B
Acetyl Chain
44.0%$4.2B
WLKWestlake Corporation
FY 2025
Performance and Essential Materials
62.9%$7.0B
Housing and Infrastructure Products
37.1%$4.1B
EMNEastman Chemical Company
FY 2025
Advanced Materials
33.0%$2.9B
Additives And Functional Products
33.0%$2.9B
Chemical Intermediates
22.0%$1.9B
Fibers
12.0%$1.1B

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEOHLAGGINGWLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MEOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 3.1x MEOH's $3.6B. EMN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, MEOH holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.6B$6.7B$9.5B$11.0B$8.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$909M$284M$58M-$462M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$80M-$127M-$1.0B-$1.6B$399M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$748M$352M$944M-$508M$498M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.3%+5.3%+20.1%+1.5%+19.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.9%-1.6%-7.4%-15.5%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.2%-1.9%-10.8%-14.9%+4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.8%+5.2%+9.9%-4.6%+5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%-3.7%-2.2%-6.8%-4.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-61.8%+3.1%-3.2%-40.8%
MEOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MEOH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.0x trailing earnings, EMN trades at a 72% valuation discount to MEOH's 65.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MEOH's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CE's 12.1x.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$3.0B$6.5B$12.5B$8.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.8B$6.3B$18.2B$16.2B$12.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS65.30x-72.32x-5.49x-8.30x17.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.21x10.45x26.08x12.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.60x9.88x12.06x8.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.32x0.45x0.68x1.12x0.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.64x1.59x1.43x1.35x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.49x12.29x8.14x19.87x
MEOH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-22 for CE. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CE's 2.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEOH scores 5/9 vs WLK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.9%-6.6%-21.5%-16.8%+6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%-1.7%-4.6%-8.2%+2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+1.7%+3.4%-9.0%+6.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%+1.9%+4.1%-8.8%+7.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955435
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.29x1.76x2.89x0.69x0.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B$3.2B$11.7B$3.7B$4.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$428M$168M$1.3B$2.7B$566M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.5B$3.4B$12.9B$6.4B$5.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.93x0.66x-0.57x-24.17x2.22x
EMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEOH five years ago would be worth $16,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,049 for CE. Over the past 12 months, MEOH leads with a +91.9% total return vs EMN's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEOH at 12.8% vs OLN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+51.1%+25.1%+38.7%+32.0%+15.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+91.9%+35.2%+20.8%+27.6%+2.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.6%-46.8%-40.8%-12.8%+3.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.2%-33.9%-59.5%+2.3%-28.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+135.7%+61.0%+13.3%+142.4%+35.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.8%-19.0%-16.0%-4.5%+1.1%
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MEOH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MEOH is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OLN's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MEOH currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs WLK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.39x1.47x1.11x1.06x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.75$30.46$70.70$124.23$84.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$31.57$18.08$35.13$56.33$56.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.0%+87.8%+82.6%+78.4%+87.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.458.645.032.256.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M2.7M2.4M1.2M1.5M
MEOH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

EMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MEOH as "Buy", OLN as "Hold", CE as "Hold", WLK as "Hold", EMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for CE (target: $65) vs -9.1% for OLN (target: $24). For income investors, EMN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.47% vs CE's 0.20%.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…OLN logoOLNOlin CorporationCE logoCECelanese Corporat…WLK logoWLKWestlake Corporat…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.75$24.33$65.40$101.88$77.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts1935373235
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.0%+0.2%+2.2%+4.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4301212
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75$0.80$0.12$2.11$3.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%0.0%+0.5%+1.2%
EMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MEOH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EMN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallMethanex Corporation (MEOH)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MEOH vs OLN vs CE vs WLK vs EMN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Westlake Corporation (WLK). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Methanex Corporation (MEOH) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

On trailing P/E, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the cheapest at 18.

0x versus Methanex Corporation at 65. 3x. On forward P/E, Methanex Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

Over the past 5 years, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) delivered a total return of +62.

2%, compared to -59. 5% for Celanese Corporation (CE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +142. 4% versus CE's +13. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

39β versus Olin Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning OLN is approximately 277% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 3% for Celanese Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.

7% versus -8. 0% for Westlake Corporation (WLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Celanese Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CE leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

4% net margin versus -13. 5% for Westlake Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEOH leads at 12. 9% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEOH leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) trades at 8.

2x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Westlake Corporation — 17. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CE: 12. 0% to $65. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE).

09

Is MEOH or OLN or CE or WLK or EMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

39), 1. 2% yield, +135. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +135. 7%, CE: +13. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MEOH and OLN and CE and WLK and EMN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MEOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock. MEOH, OLN, WLK, EMN pay a dividend while CE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MEOH

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OLN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WLK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EMN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MEOH and OLN and CE and WLK and EMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MEOH: 2.1% · OLN: -3.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.