REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MFAO vs GPMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
MFAO vs GPMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.56B | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $650M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $135M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 59.3% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 41.0% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $10.99B | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $66M |
MFAO vs GPMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFA Financial, Inc.… (MFAO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFAO vs GPMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 7.1%
- Rev growth 213.0%, EPS growth 104.9%
- 18.8% 10Y total return vs GPMT's -50.0%
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GPMT's 187.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GPMT's 14.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.9% vs GPMT's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs 2.6% |
MFAO vs GPMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFAO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFAO is the larger business by revenue, generating $650M annually — 4.9x GPMT's $132M. MFAO is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $650M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $268M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $135M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $91M | $463,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.3% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | -30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +118.9% | +157.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -103.0% | +40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GPMT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MFAO's 19.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPMT's 20.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.99x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.36x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.33x | 20.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.55x | 27.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFAO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFAO delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. GPMT carries lower financial leverage with a 2.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFAO's 6.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPMT scores 6/9 vs MFAO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | -7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.01x | 2.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.8B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.34x | 0.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MFAO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFAO five years ago would be worth $11,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, MFAO leads with a +10.9% total return vs GPMT's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFAO at 5.9% vs GPMT's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | -19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MFAO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MFAO is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFAO currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $3.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.52 | $1.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 154K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFAO and GPMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GPMT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.98% vs MFAO's 7.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +14.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +7.6% |
MFAO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MFAO vs GPMT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFAO or GPMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) is the stronger pick with 213. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 187. 8% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). MFA Financial, Inc. 9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MFAO or GPMT?
Over the past 5 years, MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFAO returned +18. 8% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MFAO or GPMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 140% more volatile than MFAO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for MFA Financial, Inc. 9. 000% Senior Notes — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MFAO or GPMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) is pulling ahead at 213. 0% versus 187. 8% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MFA Financial, Inc. 9. 000% Senior Notes grew EPS 104. 9% year-over-year, compared to 73. 7% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MFAO or GPMT?
MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFAO leads at 78. 8% versus 43. 6% for GPMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFAO leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MFAO or GPMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) offers the highest yield at 14. 0%, versus 7. 1% for MFA Financial, Inc. 9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO).
07Is MFAO or GPMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
9. 000% Senior Notes (MFAO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFAO: +18. 8%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MFAO and GPMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.