MFG vs BBVA

For growth investors, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA). Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.

A. (BBVA) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 01x versus Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. 's 0. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.

A. (BBVA) delivered a total return of +325. 2%, compared to +209. 1% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBVA returned +319. 6% versus MFG's +240. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. 's 1. 28β — meaning BBVA is approximately 14% more volatile than MFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 6% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus 4. 1% for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 30. 7% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.

A. (BBVA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 10. 3% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBVA leads at 43. 9% versus 13. 8% for MFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBVA leads at 83. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. 's 0. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 8% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 1. 8% yield, +240. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFG: +240. 7%, BBVA: +319. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BBVA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.