Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MFH
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$352M
5Y Perf.+246.3%
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-92.7%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-74.4%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-28.3%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-99.3%

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MFH logoMFH
FTFT logoFTFT
RCON logoRCON
CLPS logoCLPS
AIXI logoAIXI
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$352M$6M$17M$25M$8M
Revenue (TTM)$1M$4M$66M$299M$115M
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-5M$-43M$-4M$-53M
Gross Margin-37.3%10.7%23.0%22.8%64.3%
Operating Margin-458.3%-8.9%-86.5%-1.4%-44.2%
Total Debt$8M$2M$34M$34M$46M
Cash & Equiv.$24M$2M$99M$28M$847K

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MFH
FTFT
RCON
CLPS
AIXI
StockMar 23Jan 26Return
Mercurity Fintech H… (MFH)100346.3+246.3%
Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT)1007.3-92.7%
Recon Technology, L… (RCON)10025.6-74.4%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10071.7-28.3%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)1000.7-99.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 5 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MFH
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.
The Banking Pick

MFH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 125.9% NII/revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
Best for: growth
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
The Growth Play

FTFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
Best for: growth exposure
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
  • Beta 0.47, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • -78.5% 10Y total return vs MFH's -94.0%
  • -1.3% margin vs MFH's -450.1%
  • Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AIXI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMFH logoMFH125.9% NII/revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
Quality / MarginsCLPS logoCLPS-1.3% margin vs MFH's -450.1%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-5.4% vs AIXI's -79.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CLPS logoCLPS-3.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC -7.9% vs -34.4%

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MFHMercurity Fintech Holding Inc.
FY 2024
Other Services
100.0%$45,500
FTFTFuture FinTech Group Inc.
FY 2023
Other Segments
100.0%$1M
RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
FY 2025
Automation product and software
75.7%$29M
Oilfield environmental protection
22.6%$9M
Platform Outsourcing Services
1.7%$642,405
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGAIXI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 297.0x MFH's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.3% (CLPS) to -4.5% (MFH). On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$4M$66M$299M$115M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M-$34M-$54M-$1M-$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$5M-$43M-$4M-$53M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M$56.6B-$44M$0-$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-37.3%+10.7%+23.0%+22.8%+64.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.6%-8.9%-86.5%-1.4%-44.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.5%-120.6%-64.3%-1.3%-45.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%+14767.2%-65.9%-2.3%-2.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+110.9%+2.6%+15.3%-64.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.4%+100.0%+35.7%+75.8%-29.9%
FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MFH and FTFT and AIXI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Market CapShares × price$352M$6M$17M$25M$8M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$335M$6M$7M$31M$53M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-68.32x-0.54x-1.22x-3.48x-0.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue349.01x1.65x1.72x0.15x0.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.86x0.06x0.11x0.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — MFH and FTFT and AIXI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLPS delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-58 for MFH. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFH scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-57.7%-16.4%-9.2%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-38.9%-11.9%-8.0%-3.2%-65.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.7%-97.5%-10.6%-7.9%-34.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.9%-117.5%-11.8%-9.8%-3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965424
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.32x0.04x0.08x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M-$457,223-$64M$6M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$24M$2M$99M$28M$846,593
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$2M$34M$34M$46M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-17.73x-228.78x-372.30x-14.13x
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MFH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MFH five years ago would be worth $7,953 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFH at 47.1% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.1%+66.7%-45.8%-10.3%+68.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.8%-16.1%-49.1%-5.4%-79.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+218.1%-90.2%-88.7%+0.5%-98.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.5%-99.3%-99.4%-69.3%-98.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.0%-98.8%-99.3%-78.5%-98.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+47.1%-53.9%-51.6%+0.2%-75.9%
MFH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x2.54x0.47x0.27x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.77$4.03$7.16$1.88$4.02
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.38$0.56$0.75$0.80$0.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.8%+31.0%+11.7%+48.2%+18.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.446.442.549.849.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded170K108K90K15K60.6M
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMFH logoMFHMercurity Fintech…FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CLPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). FTFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MFH vs FTFT vs RCON vs CLPS vs AIXI: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.

(MFH) is the stronger pick with 125. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI?

Over the past 5 years, Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.

(MFH) delivered a total return of -20. 5%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 5% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 835% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.

(MFH) is pulling ahead at 125. 9% versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI?

CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the more profitable company, earning -4.

3% net margin versus -450. 1% for Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPS leads at -4. 0% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. MFH, FTFT, RCON, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is MFH or FTFT or RCON or CLPS or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between MFH and FTFT and RCON and CLPS and AIXI?

These companies operate in different sectors (MFH (Financial Services) and FTFT (Technology) and RCON (Energy) and CLPS (Technology) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MFH is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while MFH, FTFT, RCON, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MFH

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 62%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTFT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MFH and FTFT and RCON and CLPS and AIXI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MFH: 125.9% · FTFT: 110.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.