Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MFIN vs UBER
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
MFIN vs UBER — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $221M | $162.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $353M | $53.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $8.54B |
| Gross Margin | 96.7% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 23.5x |
| Total Debt | $316M | $13.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $7.74B |
MFIN vs UBER — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 403.9 | +303.9% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 218.0 | +118.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFIN vs UBER
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.1%, EPS growth 17.1%
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs UBER's 18.3%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 23.5x)
UBER is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.09
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs MFIN's 54.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs UBER's 18.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 23.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs MFIN's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MFIN's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.3% vs UBER's -7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 13.6% vs 17.2% |
MFIN vs UBER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MFIN vs UBER — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 152.0x MFIN's $353M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.9% (UBER) to 12.2% (MFIN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $353M | $53.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $8.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.7% | +41.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | -84.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 68% valuation discount to UBER's 16.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UBER's 26.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $162.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $336M | $168.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.29x | 16.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.84x | 23.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.89x | 26.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 5.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.75x | 16.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $9 for MFIN. UBER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFIN's 0.62x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +14.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.2% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $115M | $5.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $316M | $13.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 20.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,232 for MFIN. Over the past 12 months, MFIN leads with a +8.3% total return vs UBER's -7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 26.8% vs MFIN's 16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | -4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | -7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.7% | +103.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.5% | +90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MFIN and UBER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MFIN's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFIN currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs UBER's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $101.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $68.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 15.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MFIN as "Hold" and UBER as "Buy". MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $104.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.45 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +4.0% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UBER leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MFIN vs UBER: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFIN or UBER a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 3% for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MFIN or UBER?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Uber Technologies, Inc. at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MFIN or UBER?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +69. 7%, compared to +22. 3% for Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +90. 4% versus MFIN's +54. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MFIN or UBER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Medallion Financial Corp. 's 1. 15β — meaning MFIN is approximately 6% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 62% for Medallion Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MFIN or UBER?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus 18. 3% for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medallion Financial Corp. grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to 3. 7% for Uber Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MFIN or UBER?
Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 3% net margin versus 12. 2% for Medallion Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 10. 7% for UBER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MFIN or UBER more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for Uber Technologies, Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MFIN or UBER?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
8% yield) pays a dividend. UBER does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MFIN or UBER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +54. 5%, UBER: +90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MFIN and UBER?
These companies operate in different sectors (MFIN (Financial Services) and UBER (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MFIN pays a dividend while UBER does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.