MGA
Magna International Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$17.48B
5Y Perf.+48.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MGA vs APTV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
APTV
Aptiv PLC
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$12.11B
5Y Perf.-24.6%
MGA vs APTV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MGA | APTV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $17.48B | $12.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.18B | $20.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $829M | $365M |
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $8.32B | $8.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.61B | $1.85B |
MGA vs APTV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MGA
APTV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magna International… (MGA) | 100 | 148.6 | +48.6% |
| Aptiv PLC (APTV) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGA vs APTV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Aptiv PLC is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MGA
Magna International Inc.
The Income Pick
MGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 3.1%
- 91.9% 10Y total return vs APTV's 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 64.9%, current ratio 1.25x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
APTV
Aptiv PLC
The Growth Play
APTV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs MGA's -0.2%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | APTV | 3.5% revenue growth vs MGA's -0.2% |
| Value | APTV | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | MGA | 2.0% margin vs APTV's 1.8% |
| Stability / Safety | MGA | Beta 1.08 vs APTV's 1.44, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MGA | 3.1% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MGA | +94.7% vs APTV's -2.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGA | 2.6% ROA vs APTV's 1.7%, ROIC 8.6% vs 5.5% |
MGA vs APTV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MGA vs APTV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMGALAGGINGAPTV
APTVAptiv PLC
1leads
MGAMagna International I…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs APTVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
APTV4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MGA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MGA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MGA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MGA1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APTV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGA is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 2.0x APTV's $20.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.0% (MGA) to 1.8% (APTV).
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.2B | $20.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $829M | $365M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.5% | +19.4% |
APTV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MGA and APTV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, MGA trades at a 72% valuation discount to APTV's 75.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGA's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APTV's 8.4x.
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.5B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.2B | $18.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.97x | 75.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.26x | 8.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.03x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.31x | 8.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.62x | 7.92x |
Evenly matched — MGA and APTV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGA delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $4 for APTV. MGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APTV's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APTV scores 8/9 vs MGA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.7B | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.07x | 4.44x |
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGA five years ago would be worth $7,492 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,015 for APTV. Over the past 12 months, MGA leads with a +94.7% total return vs APTV's -2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGA at 7.8% vs APTV's -15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | -27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.7% | -2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | -39.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.1% | -59.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.9% | +8.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.8% | -15.4% |
MGA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APTV's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGA currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs APTV's 63.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.94 | $88.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.55 | $52.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +63.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 29.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M |
MGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MGA as "Buy" and APTV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.8% upside for APTV (target: $95) vs 4.6% for MGA (target: $66). MGA is the only dividend payer here at 3.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MGAMagna Internation… | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.60 | $94.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.96 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +3.3% |
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MGA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). APTV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
Best OverallMagna International Inc. (MGA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MGA vs APTV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGA or APTV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Magna International Inc. (MGA). Magna International Inc. (MGA) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magna International Inc. (MGA) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGA or APTV?
On trailing P/E, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the cheapest at 21. 0x versus Aptiv PLC at 75. 7x. On forward P/E, Aptiv PLC is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGA or APTV?
Over the past 5 years, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) delivered a total return of -25. 1%, compared to -59. 8% for Aptiv PLC (APTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGA returned +91. 9% versus APTV's +8. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGA or APTV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Aptiv PLC's 1. 44β — meaning APTV is approximately 33% more volatile than MGA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magna International Inc. (MGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 85% for Aptiv PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGA or APTV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aptiv PLC (APTV) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -0. 2% for Magna International Inc. (MGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magna International Inc. grew EPS -15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -89. 2% for Aptiv PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, APTV leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGA or APTV?
Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus 0. 8% for Aptiv PLC — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APTV leads at 5. 8% versus 5. 0% for MGA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APTV leads at 19. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGA or APTV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aptiv PLC (APTV) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 9. 3x for Magna International Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APTV: 66. 8% to $94. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGA or APTV?
In this comparison, MGA (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. APTV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MGA or APTV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGA: +91. 9%, APTV: +8. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGA and APTV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; APTV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MGA pays a dividend while APTV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MGA: 3.6% · APTV: 5.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MGA: 21.0x · APTV: 75.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.