MGN
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-50.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MGN vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$628M
5Y Perf.-17.7%
MGN vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MGN | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $2M | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $388K | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $394M |
Quick Verdict: MGN vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TIGR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MGN
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Defensive Pick
MGN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.09x
- Lower P/E (1.3x vs 6.8x)
- 16.0% ROA vs TIGR's 1.6%, ROIC 37.1% vs 13.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick
TIGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.02
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs MGN's -96.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TIGR | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs MGN's 17.9% |
| Value | MGN | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 6.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | TIGR | 15.5% margin vs MGN's 9.7% |
| Stability / Safety | TIGR | Beta 2.02 vs MGN's 2.66 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TIGR | -29.9% vs MGN's -96.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGN | 16.0% ROA vs TIGR's 1.6%, ROIC 37.1% vs 13.8% |
MGN vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
MGN vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGMGN
MGNMegan Holdings Limite…
2leads
TIGRUP Fintech Holding Lt…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MGNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TIGR4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MGN4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MGN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TIGR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TIGR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 4.6x MGN's $85M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGN's 9.7%.
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MGN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.3x trailing earnings, MGN trades at a 93% valuation discount to TIGR's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGN's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TIGR's 2.8x.
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.27x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.60x | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.76x |
MGN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGN delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIGR. MGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs MGN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.3% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.0% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.1% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +38.6% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $388,113 | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6460.27x | 3.26x |
MGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $313 for MGN. Over the past 12 months, TIGR leads with a -29.9% total return vs MGN's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs MGN's -68.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.8% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.5% | +30.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGN's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs MGN's 1.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.57x | 2.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.63 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.8% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.5 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.3M | 2.3M |
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | MGNMegan Holdings Li… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MGN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MGN vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGN or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 9% for Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN). Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGN or TIGR?
On trailing P/E, Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) is the cheapest at 1.
3x versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A at 17. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGN or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -96. 9% for Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 7% versus MGN's -96. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGN or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 06β versus Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 57β — meaning MGN is approximately 25% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGN or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus 17. 9% for Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGN or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 9. 7% for Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus 11. 7% for MGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MGN or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MGN or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIGR: -39. 7%, MGN: -96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MGN and TIGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MGN (Industrials) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MGN: 17.9% · TIGR: 43.7%)Net Margin>
%
(MGN: 9.7% · TIGR: 15.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MGN: 1.3x · TIGR: 17.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.