MGRB vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs CNNE

For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(MGRB) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRB) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(MGRB) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 01x versus Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 's 0. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Invesco Ltd.

(IVZ) delivered a total return of +8. 2%, compared to -60. 5% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +142. 6% versus CNNE's -18. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(MGRB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 125% more volatile than MGRB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 3% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(MGRB) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(MGRB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -99. 2% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRB leads at 31. 8% versus -28. 2% for CNNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGRB leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 's 0. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRB) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Franklin Resources, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNNE: 21. 5% to $17. 00.

In this comparison, VRTS (6.

6% yield), BEN (4. 3% yield), IVZ (3. 1% yield), MGRB (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CNNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 6. 6% yield, +142. 6% 10Y return). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRTS: +142. 6%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MGRB (Financial Services) and BEN (Financial Services) and IVZ (Financial Services) and VRTS (Financial Services) and CNNE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MGRB is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BEN, IVZ, VRTS pay a dividend while MGRB, CNNE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.