Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $402M | $15.86B | $11.92B | $949M | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.45B | $8.77B | $6.38B | $831M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $717M | $812M | $-243M | $138M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 86.0% | 80.3% | 43.2% | 74.9% | 96.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 6.9% | -10.9% | 17.4% | 38.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.4x | 11.2x | 10.4x | 5.5x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.69B | $13.30B | $10.12B | $2.84B | $6.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $586M | $3.57B | $1.98B | $477M | $42M |
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliated Managers… (MGRD) | 100 | 60.7 | -39.3% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGRD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- PEG 0.01 vs DHIL's 1.14
- 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.01 vs 1.14
Among these 5 stocks, BEN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IVZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- +93.1% vs VRTS's -5.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BEN's 0.7%
VRTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 6.6%
- NIM 0.9% vs DHIL's 0.7%
- 6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs MGRD's 0.2%
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 55.4% 10Y total return vs VRTS's 142.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57 vs IVZ's 1.67
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.01 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs IVZ's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs MGRD's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.1% vs VRTS's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BEN's 0.7% |
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MGRD leads 2 • IVZ leads 1 • VRTS leads 1 • BEN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 55.6x DHIL's $158M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVZ's -4.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $8.8B | $6.4B | $831M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $855M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $205M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $717M | $812M | -$243M | $138M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $978M | $938M | $1.9B | -$67M | $44.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.0% | +80.3% | +43.2% | +74.9% | +96.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +6.9% | -10.9% | +17.4% | +38.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +6.0% | -4.4% | +16.7% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.1% | +10.4% | +22.6% | -8.9% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +149.1% | +100.0% | +34.2% | +10.9% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MGRD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, MGRD trades at a 98% valuation discount to BEN's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGRD offers better value at 0.02x vs DHIL's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $402M | $15.9B | $11.9B | $949M | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $25.6B | $20.1B | $3.3B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.66x | 33.54x | -16.77x | 7.10x | 9.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.45x | 11.21x | 10.44x | 5.55x | 9.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | — | — | 0.48x | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.65x | 22.53x | 16.34x | 16.20x | 110.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 1.81x | 1.87x | 1.14x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | 1.11x | 0.94x | 0.95x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.40x | 17.40x | 8.27x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IVZ. MGRD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRD scores 8/9 vs VRTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +5.6% | -1.7% | +13.5% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +2.5% | -0.9% | +3.6% | +19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +1.6% | -2.3% | +3.0% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +2.0% | -2.6% | +3.7% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.94x | 0.78x | 2.74x | 36.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $9.7B | $8.1B | $2.4B | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $586M | $3.6B | $2.0B | $477M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $13.3B | $10.1B | $2.8B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.69x | 15.19x | -6.19x | 2.15x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IVZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHIL five years ago would be worth $12,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,496 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +93.1% total return vs VRTS's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IVZ at 21.6% vs VRTS's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | +29.6% | +0.4% | -9.8% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.7% | +55.5% | +93.1% | -5.5% | +33.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +35.3% | +79.8% | +0.1% | +22.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +7.4% | +8.2% | -35.0% | +28.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +23.5% | +22.1% | +142.6% | +55.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +10.6% | +21.6% | +0.0% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVZ's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.31x | 1.67x | 1.14x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.94 | $31.44 | $29.61 | $215.06 | $175.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.01 | $20.08 | $14.10 | $121.61 | $114.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +97.1% | +90.6% | +65.9% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 78.4 | 69.4 | 55.4 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 5.1M | 5.1M | 101K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BEN as "Hold", IVZ as "Hold", VRTS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.0% upside for VRTS (target: $163) vs -5.8% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs MGRD's 0.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.75 | $29.72 | $163.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 28 | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.3% | +3.1% | +6.6% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $1.33 | $0.83 | $9.32 | $9.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +1.5% | +15.6% | +6.3% | +3.6% |
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MGRD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
MGRD vs BEN vs IVZ vs VRTS vs DHIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(MGRD) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E (0. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(MGRD) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 01x versus Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
Over the past 5 years, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) delivered a total return of +28. 3%, compared to -35. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +142. 6% versus MGRD's -20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 192% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(MGRD) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Invesco Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -10. 9% for IVZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD) trades at 0. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Franklin Resources, Inc. — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRTS: 15. 0% to $163. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 0. 2% for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD).
09Is MGRD or BEN or IVZ or VRTS or DHIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +55. 4%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGRD and BEN and IVZ and VRTS and DHIL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGRD is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock. BEN, IVZ, VRTS, DHIL pay a dividend while MGRD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.