Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Equipment & Services
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $150.63B | $536.23B | $6.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $467K | $63.31B | $92.15B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $7.49B | $25.12B | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 60.6% | 69.3% | 68.1% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -41.4% | 23.4% | 26.1% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x | 19.2x | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $215K | $67.42B | $36.63B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59K | $1.14B | $24.11B | $229M |
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 64.9 | -35.1% |
| Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.7 | +158.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JNJ's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 51.5x)
JNJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 51.2%, current ratio 1.11x
- 27.3% margin vs MGRX's -42.5%
- Beta 0.06 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs JNJ's 132.3%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs MGRX's -15.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs MGRX's -15.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.3% margin vs MGRX's -42.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JNJ's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs MGRX's -80.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs MGRX's -106.4%, ROIC 20.7% vs -83.8% |
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JNJ leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFE leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • MGRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.1B annually — 197360.1x MGRX's $466,908. JNJ is the more profitable business, keeping 27.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGRX's -42.5%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $466,908 | $63.3B | $92.1B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $21.0B | $31.4B | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $7.5B | $25.1B | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $9.5B | $19.1B | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.6% | +69.3% | +68.1% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | +23.4% | +26.1% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.5% | +11.8% | +27.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +15.0% | +20.7% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.8% | +5.4% | +6.8% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.5% | -9.5% | +91.0% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 61% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $150.6B | $536.2B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $216.9B | $548.8B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 19.47x | 38.43x | 50.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.94x | 19.20x | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 34.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.66x | 18.61x | 42.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.00x | 2.41x | 6.04x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 1.74x | 7.56x | 12.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.60x | 27.02x | 89.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-115 for MGRX. MGRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -114.6% | +8.3% | +31.7% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -106.4% | +3.6% | +13.0% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -83.8% | +7.5% | +20.7% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.8% | +9.0% | +17.6% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.78x | 0.51x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156,309 | $66.3B | $12.5B | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58,653 | $1.1B | $24.1B | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $214,962 | $67.4B | $36.6B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -581.90x | 4.02x | 48.23x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $57 for MGRX. Over the past 12 months, JNJ leads with a +44.8% total return vs MGRX's -80.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs MGRX's -73.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.1% | +6.9% | +7.9% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.8% | +23.7% | +44.8% | -51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -18.4% | +46.3% | +116.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -13.3% | +46.1% | +137.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +29.6% | +132.3% | +161.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.4% | -6.6% | +13.5% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and JNJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JNJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs MGRX's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.54x | 0.06x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $28.75 | $251.71 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $21.97 | $146.12 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.4% | +92.1% | +88.4% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 44.2 | 37.1 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.4M | 33.3M | 7.0M | 34.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGRX and JNJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFE as "Hold", JNJ as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, MGRX offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs JNJ's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.27 | $249.27 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 39 | 40 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +6.5% | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 | 36 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $1.72 | $4.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.4% |
JNJ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MGRX vs PFE vs JNJ vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -99. 4% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus MGRX's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 4114% more volatile than JNJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mangoceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -57. 8% for Johnson & Johnson. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -1413. 6% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JNJ leads at 24. 9% versus -1294. 4% for MGRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFE leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 42. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 15. 6% to $29. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS?
In this comparison, MGRX (100.
0% yield), PFE (6. 5% yield), JNJ (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HIMS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MGRX or PFE or JNJ or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 2% yield, +132. 3% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JNJ: +132. 3%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGRX and PFE and JNJ and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JNJ is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. MGRX, PFE, JNJ pay a dividend while HIMS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.