Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MHH vs NSIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
MHH vs NSIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $78M | $2.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $8.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66K | $157M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 24.0x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $1.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $358M |
MHH vs NSIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastech Digital, In… (MHH) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHH vs NSIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MHH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35
- Rev growth -1.1%, EPS growth 145.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.22x
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 202.4% 10Y total return vs MHH's 97.4%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 24.0x)
- 1.9% margin vs MHH's -0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.1% revenue growth vs NSIT's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 24.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs MHH's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NSIT's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.5% vs NSIT's -46.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs MHH's -0.1%, ROIC 10.3% vs 4.4% |
MHH vs NSIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MHH vs NSIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSIT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 41.9x MHH's $197M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (NSIT) to -0.0% (MHH). On growth, NSIT holds the edge at -1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $491M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66,000 | $157M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $279M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +68.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, NSIT trades at a 39% valuation discount to MHH's 24.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NSIT's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MHH's 7.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.96x | 14.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.48x | 7.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.56x | 7.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MHH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NSIT delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-0 for MHH. MHH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSIT's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHH scores 7/9 vs NSIT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.69x | 3.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NSIT five years ago would be worth $7,022 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,304 for MHH. Over the past 12 months, MHH leads with a -10.5% total return vs NSIT's -46.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHH at -10.0% vs NSIT's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.5% | -46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -42.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -29.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.4% | +202.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | -17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MHH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHH is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NSIT's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MHH currently trades 70.8% from its 52-week high vs NSIT's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.48 | $148.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $63.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 40.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 401K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +6.8% |
MHH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NSIT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
MHH vs NSIT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHH or NSIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the stronger pick with -1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT). Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MHH or NSIT?
On trailing P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Mastech Digital, Inc. at 24. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MHH or NSIT?
Over the past 5 years, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) delivered a total return of -29. 8%, compared to -57. 0% for Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSIT returned +186. 0% versus MHH's +97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MHH or NSIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Insight Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning NSIT is approximately 275% more volatile than MHH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 96% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MHH or NSIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is pulling ahead at -1. 1% versus -5. 2% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastech Digital, Inc. grew EPS 145. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for Insight Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHH leads at -3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MHH or NSIT?
Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus 1. 7% for Mastech Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSIT leads at 4. 6% versus 1. 9% for MHH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MHH leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MHH or NSIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MHH or NSIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MHH: +97. 4%, NSIT: +186. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MHH and NSIT?
These companies operate in different sectors (MHH (Industrials) and NSIT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.