MHLA
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-40.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MHLA vs RNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
Insurance - Reinsurance
Market Cap$12.98B
5Y Perf.+79.2%
MHLA vs RNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MHLA | RNR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $12.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $11.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-211M | $3.09B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 35.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $255M | $2.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $1.73B |
MHLA vs RNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MHLA
RNR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maiden Holdings, Lt… (MHLA) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHLA vs RNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RNR leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MHLA
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046
The Insurance Play
In this particular matchup, MHLA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: financial services exposure
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
The Insurance Pick
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.03, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.2%
- 176.9% 10Y total return vs MHLA's 14.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RNR | 9.4% revenue growth vs MHLA's -36.8% |
| Value | RNR | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | RNR | 26.9% margin vs MHLA's -5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | RNR | Lower D/E ratio (12.1% vs 5.6%) |
| Dividends | RNR | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RNR | +21.9% vs MHLA's -3.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RNR | 5.7% ROA vs MHLA's -17.1%, ROIC 16.0% vs 4.3% |
MHLA vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
FY 2025
MHLA vs RNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRNRLAGGINGMHLA
MHLAMaiden Holdings, Ltd.…
0leads
RNRRenaissanceRe Holding…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MHLAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RNR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RNR3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RNR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RNR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RNR1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 276.4x MHLA's $42M. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MHLA's -5.1%. On growth, RNR holds the edge at -36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$211M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$97M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +35.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.4% | -36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +100.9% |
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RNR's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MHLA's 69.4x.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.21x | 5.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 69.43x | 3.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.04x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.59x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.51x |
RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNR delivers a 16.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-6 for MHLA. RNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MHLA's 5.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs MHLA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.6% | +16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.1% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.64x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$35M | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $255M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.74x | 33.28x |
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RNR five years ago would be worth $18,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,450 for MHLA. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs MHLA's -3.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNR at 13.4% vs MHLA's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.8% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.5% | +87.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +176.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +13.4% |
RNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MHLA and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHLA is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RNR's -0.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs MHLA's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.05x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.70 | $318.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.93 | $231.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 303K |
Evenly matched — MHLA and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
RNR is the only dividend payer here at 0.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MHLAMaiden Holdings, … | RNRRenaissanceRe Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +12.3% |
RNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
RNR leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MHLA vs RNR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHLA or RNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 8% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046 (MHLA). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MHLA or RNR?
Over the past 5 years, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) delivered a total return of +87. 1%, compared to -5. 5% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046 (MHLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNR returned +176. 9% versus MHLA's +14. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MHLA or RNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Maiden Holdings, Ltd.
6. 625 NT 2046 (MHLA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 05β versus RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 's -0. 03β — meaning RNR is approximately -30% more volatile than MHLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 6% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MHLA or RNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -36. 8% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046 (MHLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to -428. 9% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MHLA or RNR?
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus -356. 1% for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6. 625 NT 2046 — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MHLA leads at 37. 4% versus 31. 5% for RNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MHLA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MHLA or RNR?
In this comparison, RNR (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. MHLA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MHLA or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, MHLA: +14. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MHLA and RNR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MHLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. RNR pays a dividend while MHLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MHLA: -51.4% · RNR: -36.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.