Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Security & Protection Services
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Security & Protection Services | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $7.38B | $11.76B | $12.47B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $4.16B | $15.23B | $561M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-278M | $634M | $371M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 45.0% | 30.0% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 20.6% | 7.8% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 15.6x | 17.6x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.17B | $2.28B | $5.86B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $356M | $280M | $146M |
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 674.2 | +574.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIDD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 78.3%, current ratio 2.57x
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 127.3% 10Y total return vs MIDD's 46.1%
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- 7.8% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4%
SWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ARLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.3% vs ALLE's -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 18.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs ALLE's -1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 8.7% |
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARLO leads 2 • ALLE leads 1 • MIDD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 27.2x ARLO's $561M. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $4.2B | $15.2B | $561M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $959M | $1.7B | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$278M | $634M | $371M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $559M | $704M | $726M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +45.0% | +30.0% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +20.6% | +7.8% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +15.2% | +2.4% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +16.9% | +4.8% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +9.7% | +2.7% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.3% | -7.0% | -35.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, ALLE trades at a 83% valuation discount to ARLO's 106.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWK's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 148.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $11.8B | $12.5B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $13.7B | $18.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.41x | 18.39x | 30.26x | 106.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.03x | 15.60x | 17.64x | 18.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.56x | 13.83x | 11.71x | 148.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.89x | 0.82x | 3.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.94x | 5.72x | 1.35x | 12.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.21x | 17.14x | 18.12x | 24.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. ARLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLE's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs MIDD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | +32.1% | +4.1% | +22.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.1% | +12.3% | +1.7% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +18.1% | +5.8% | +35.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +20.8% | +7.0% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.10x | 0.65x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $1.9B | $5.6B | -$140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $356M | $280M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $2.3B | $5.9B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 8.61x | 2.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, ARLO leads with a +43.3% total return vs ALLE's -1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 29.3% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -14.6% | +5.9% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | -1.0% | +41.7% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.6% | +32.6% | +6.9% | +116.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.5% | +3.2% | -56.2% | +123.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.1% | +127.3% | -1.5% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +9.9% | +2.2% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MIDD and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MIDD currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs ALLE's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.67x | 1.83x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.44 | $183.11 | $93.37 | $19.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.82 | $131.25 | $58.23 | $10.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +74.7% | +85.9% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 38.5 | 61.0 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 571K | 887K | 2.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIDD as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", ARLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs 11.2% for SWK (target: $89). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $176.67 | $172.50 | $89.17 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 23 | 37 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +4.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 12 | 16 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.03 | $3.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +0.7% | +0.1% | +2.8% |
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ARLO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
On trailing P/E, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the cheapest at 18.
4x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +123. 1%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLE returned +127. 3% versus ARLO's -32. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 175% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 110% for Allegion plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 1. 1% for ARLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15.
6x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for Arlo Technologies, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 26. 1% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MIDD, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, ARLO: -32. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIDD and ALLE and SWK and ARLO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ALLE, SWK pay a dividend while MIDD, ARLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.